A. Y. L. Wong, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China D. Samartzis, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA P. W. H. Cheung, J. P. Y. Cheung, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Apr;477(4):676-686. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000569.
Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most common spine deformity in adolescent patients. Although structural deformity may affect spinal biomechanics of patients with AIS, little is known regarding various period prevalence proportions of back pain and chronic back pain and factors associated with back pain in such patients.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the period prevalence rates of back pain among teenagers with AIS? (2) Is back pain in patients with AIS associated with curve severity?
A total of 987 patients with AIS who were treated without surgery were recruited from a single center's scoliosis clinic. Between December 2016 and July 2017, this center treated 1116 patients with suspected AIS. During that time, patients were offered surgery when their Cobb angle was at least 50° and had evidence of curve progression between two visits, and most of the patients who were offered surgery underwent it; other patients with AIS were managed nonsurgically with regular observation, brace prescription, posture training, and reassurance. To be included in this prospective, cross-sectional study, a patient needed to be aged between 10 and 18 years with a Cobb angle > 10°. No followup data were required. A total of 1097 patients with AIS were managed nonsurgically (98.3% of the group seen during the period in question). After obtaining parental consent, patients provided data related to their demographics; physical activity levels; lifetime, 12-month, 30-day, 7-day, and current thoracic pain and low back pain (LBP); chronic back pain (thoracic pain/LBP); brace use; and treatments for scoliosis/back pain. Pain was rated on a 10-point numeric rating scale for pain. The Insomnia Severity Index, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and Depression Anxiety Stress Scales were also assessed. These features and radiologic study parameters between patients with and without back pain were also compared. Factors associated with current and 12-month back pain as well as chronic back pain were analyzed by multivariate analyses.
Depending on the types of period prevalence, the prevalence of thoracic pain ranged from 6% (55 of 987) within 12 months to 14% (139 of 987) within 7 days, whereas that of LBP ranged from 6% (54 of 987) to 29% (289 of 987). Specifically, chronic thoracic pain or LBP had the lowest prevalence. Compared with the no pain group, patients with current back pain had more severe insomnia (odds ratio [OR], 1.80; p = 0.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.93) and daytime sleepiness (OR, 2.41; p < 0.001, 95% CI, 1.43-4.07). Those with chronic back pain had the same problems along with moderate depression (OR, 2.49; p = 0.03; 95% CI, 1.08-5.71). Older age (OR range, 1.17-1.42; all p values ≤ 0.030) and Cobb angle > 40° (OR range, 2.38-3.74; all p values ≤ 0.015), daytime sleepiness (OR range, 2.39-2.41; all p values ≤ 0.011), and insomnia (OR range, 1.76-2.31; all p values ≤ 0.001) were associated with episodic and/or chronic back pain. Females were more likely to experience back pain in the last 12 months than males. Moderate depression (OR, 3.29; 1.45-7.47; p = 0.004) and wearing a brace (OR, 3.00; 1.47-6.15; p = 0.003) were independently associated with chronic back pain.
Biopsychosocial factors are associated with the presence and severity of back pain in the AIS population. Our results highlight the importance of considering back pain screening/management for patients with AIS with their psychosocial profile in addition to curve magnitude monitoring. In particular, sleep quality should be routinely assessed. Longitudinal changes and effects of psychotherapy should be determined in future studies.
Level II, prognostic study.
青少年特发性脊柱侧凸(AIS)是青少年患者中最常见的脊柱畸形。尽管结构性畸形可能会影响 AIS 患者的脊柱生物力学,但对于此类患者的背痛和慢性背痛的各种时期患病率比例以及与背痛相关的因素知之甚少。
问题/目的:(1)患有 AIS 的青少年背痛的时期患病率是多少?(2)AIS 患者的背痛与曲度严重程度有关吗?
从一家单中心脊柱侧弯诊所招募了 987 名未经手术治疗的 AIS 患者。在 2016 年 12 月至 2017 年 7 月期间,该中心治疗了 1116 名疑似 AIS 的患者。当时,如果 Cobb 角至少为 50°且在两次就诊之间有曲线进展的证据,就会向患者提供手术,并且大多数接受手术的患者都接受了手术;其他接受 AIS 治疗的患者则接受非手术治疗,包括定期观察、支具处方、姿势训练和安慰。为了纳入这项前瞻性、横断面研究,患者需要年龄在 10 至 18 岁之间,Cobb 角>10°。不需要随访数据。共有 1097 名 AIS 患者接受非手术治疗(在所讨论期间接受治疗的患者中占 98.3%)。在获得家长同意后,患者提供了与人口统计学特征、身体活动水平、终生、12 个月、30 天、7 天和当前胸背痛、下背痛(LBP)、慢性背痛(胸背痛/LBP)、支具使用和脊柱侧弯/背痛治疗相关的数据。疼痛通过 10 点数字评定量表进行评分。还评估了失眠严重程度指数、爱泼沃斯嗜睡量表和抑郁焦虑压力量表。还比较了有和无背痛患者的这些特征和影像学研究参数。通过多变量分析分析了当前和 12 个月背痛以及慢性背痛的相关因素。
根据不同类型的时期患病率,胸背痛的患病率在 12 个月内为 6%(987 例中的 55 例),在 7 天内为 14%(987 例中的 139 例),而 LBP 的患病率在 12 个月内为 6%(987 例中的 54 例),在 7 天内为 29%(987 例中的 289 例)。具体来说,慢性胸背痛或 LBP 的患病率最低。与无疼痛组相比,当前有背痛的患者有更严重的失眠(比值比 [OR],1.80;p=0.02;95%置信区间 [CI],1.10-2.93)和白天嗜睡(OR,2.41;p<0.001,95%CI,1.43-4.07)。慢性背痛患者也存在同样的问题,同时还伴有中度抑郁(OR,2.49;p=0.03;95%CI,1.08-5.71)。年龄较大(OR 范围,1.17-1.42;所有 p 值均≤0.030)和 Cobb 角>40°(OR 范围,2.38-3.74;所有 p 值均≤0.015)、白天嗜睡(OR 范围,2.39-2.41;所有 p 值均≤0.011)和失眠(OR 范围,1.76-2.31;所有 p 值均≤0.001)与偶发性和/或慢性背痛相关。与男性相比,女性在过去 12 个月更有可能经历背痛。中度抑郁(OR,3.29;1.45-7.47;p=0.004)和佩戴支具(OR,3.00;1.47-6.15;p=0.003)与慢性背痛独立相关。
生物心理社会因素与 AIS 人群背痛的存在和严重程度相关。我们的研究结果强调了在监测脊柱侧凸曲度变化的同时,考虑 AIS 患者的社会心理状况对背痛筛查/管理的重要性。特别是,应定期评估睡眠质量。在未来的研究中,应确定心理治疗的纵向变化和效果。
II 级,预后研究。