AP-HP Hôpital Paul-Brousse, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Liver Intensive Care Unit, Villejuif F-94800, France; INSERM, Unité 1193, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif F-94800, France; DHU Hepatinov, Villejuif F-94800, France.
APHP Hôpital Bicêtre, Department of Pathology, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
J Hepatol. 2019 Mar;70(3):431-439. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.11.024. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Severe acute liver injury is a grave complication of exertional heatstroke. Liver transplantation (LT) may be a therapeutic option, but the criteria for LT and the optimal timing of LT have not been clearly established. The aim of this study was to define the profile of patients who require transplantation in this context.
This was a multicentre, retrospective study of patients admitted with a diagnosis of exertional heatstroke-related severe acute liver injury with a prothrombin time (PT) of less than 50%. A total of 24 male patients were studied.
Fifteen of the 24 patients (median nadir PT: 35% [29.5-40.5]) improved under medical therapy alone and survived. Nine of the 24 were listed for emergency LT. At the time of registration, the median PT was 10% (5-12) and all had numerous dysfunctional organs. Five patients (nadir PT: 12% [9-12]) were withdrawn from the list because of an elevation of PT values that mainly occurred between day 2 and day 3. Ultimately, 4 patients underwent transplantation as their PT persisted at <10%, 3 days (2.75-3.25) after the onset of exertional heatstroke, and they had more than 3 organ dysfunctions. Of these 4 patients, 3 were still alive 1 year later. Histological analysis of the 4 explanted livers demonstrated massive or sub-massive necrosis, and little potential for effective mitoses, characterised by a "mitonecrotic" appearance.
The first-line treatment for exertional heatstroke-related severe acute liver injury is medical therapy. LT is only a rare alternative and such a decision should not be taken too hastily. A persistence of PT <10%, without any signs of elevation after a median period of 3 days following the onset of heatstroke, was the trigger that prompted LT, was the trigger adopted in order to decide upon LT.
Acute liver injury due to heatstroke can progress to acute liver failure with organ dysfunction despite medical treatment; in such situations, liver transplantation (LT) may offer a therapeutic option. The classic criteria for LT appear to be poorly adapted to heatstroke-related acute liver failure. We confirmed thatmedication is the first-line therapy acute liver injury caused by heatstroke, with LT only rarely necessary. A decision to perform LT should not be made hastily. Fluctuations in prothrombin time and the patient's clinical status should be considered even in the event of severe liver failure.
严重的急性肝损伤是劳力性热射病的严重并发症。肝移植(LT)可能是一种治疗选择,但 LT 的标准和 LT 的最佳时机尚未明确。本研究的目的是确定在此背景下需要移植的患者的特征。
这是一项多中心、回顾性研究,纳入了诊断为与劳力性热射病相关的严重急性肝损伤且凝血酶原时间(PT)<50%的患者。共纳入 24 名男性患者。
24 名患者中有 15 名(中位最低 PT:35%[29.5-40.5%])仅接受药物治疗后好转并存活。24 名患者中有 9 名被列入紧急 LT 名单。登记时,中位 PT 为 10%(5-12),所有患者均存在多个功能障碍的器官。5 名患者(最低 PT:12%[9-12])因 PT 值升高而从名单中撤出,PT 值主要在第 2 天至第 3 天之间升高。最终,4 名患者因 PT 持续<10%、在劳力性热射病发作后 3 天(2.75-3.25)接受了移植,他们有超过 3 个器官功能障碍。这 4 名患者中,3 名在 1 年后仍存活。4 个已行移植的肝脏组织学分析显示,大量或亚大量坏死,有效有丝分裂的可能性较小,表现为“有丝分裂坏死”外观。
与劳力性热射病相关的严重急性肝损伤的一线治疗是药物治疗。LT 只是一种罕见的选择,不应仓促决定。PT 持续<10%,且在热射病发作后 3 天内没有任何升高迹象,是触发 LT 的原因,也是决定 LT 的触发因素。
热射病引起的急性肝损伤尽管接受了药物治疗,仍可能进展为伴有器官功能障碍的急性肝衰竭;在这种情况下,肝移植(LT)可能是一种治疗选择。LT 的经典标准似乎不太适应热射病相关的急性肝衰竭。我们证实,药物是治疗热射病引起的急性肝损伤的首选治疗方法,LT 很少需要。决定是否进行 LT 不应草率。即使发生严重肝衰竭,也应考虑凝血酶原时间的波动和患者的临床状况。