Wolpert Miranda, Dalzell Kate, Ullman Roz, Garland Lauren, Cortina Melissa, Hayes Daniel, Patalay Praveetha, Law Duncan
Evidence Based Practice Unit, Faculty of Brain Sciences, University College London, London, UK; Anna Freud National Centre for Children and Families, London, UK; Child Outcomes Research Consortium, London, UK.
Child Outcomes Research Consortium, London, UK.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2019 Jan;6(1):46-60. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30465-6. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
This Review reports on a scoping review followed by a systematic review to consider interventions designed to address or manage depression or anxiety in children and young people up to the age of 25 years without the need to involve mental health professionals. The scoping review identified 132 approaches, 103 of which referred to children or young people (younger than 25 years). These approaches included social interaction, engagement with nature, relaxation, distraction, sensory stimulation, physical activity, altering perceptions, engaging in hobbies, self-expression, and exploration. A systematic review of effectiveness studies from the literature identified in the scoping review found only 38 studies on seven types of intervention that met the inclusion criteria. 16 studies were based on cognitive or behavioural principles (15 on digital interventions and one on bibliotherapy), ten focused on physical exercise, five on light therapy, three on dietary supplements, two on massage therapy, one on online peer support, and one on contact with a dog. Most studies focused on adolescents or young adults. Evidence suggested that light therapy could be effective for season depression and that digital interventions based on attention bias modification are ineffective for anxiety. Mixed evidence was available on the effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy for depression and anxiety, and of physical exercise for depression. All other studies had insufficient certainty to obtain even tentative conclusions about effectiveness. These results highlight the disparity between the extensive range of approaches identified in the scoping review and the restricted number and focus found in the systematic review of effectiveness of these approaches. We call for an expanded research agenda that brings evaluation rigour to a wide range of self or community approaches.
本综述报告了一项范围综述,随后进行了系统综述,以考量旨在解决或管理25岁及以下儿童和青少年的抑郁或焦虑问题且无需心理健康专业人员参与的干预措施。范围综述确定了132种方法,其中103种涉及儿童或青少年(25岁以下)。这些方法包括社交互动、接触自然、放松、分散注意力、感官刺激、体育活动、改变认知、从事爱好、自我表达和探索。对范围综述中确定的文献中的有效性研究进行的系统综述发现,只有38项关于七种干预类型的研究符合纳入标准。16项研究基于认知或行为原则(15项基于数字干预,1项基于阅读疗法),10项关注体育锻炼,5项关注光疗法,3项关注膳食补充剂,2项关注按摩疗法,1项关注在线同伴支持,1项关注与狗接触。大多数研究聚焦于青少年或年轻成年人。有证据表明,光疗法对季节性抑郁可能有效,而基于注意力偏差修正的数字干预对焦虑无效。关于计算机化认知行为疗法对抑郁和焦虑的有效性以及体育锻炼对抑郁的有效性,存在混合证据。所有其他研究的确定性不足,甚至无法就有效性得出初步结论。这些结果凸显了范围综述中确定的广泛方法与这些方法有效性的系统综述中发现的有限数量和重点之间的差异。我们呼吁制定一个扩大的研究议程,将评估的严谨性引入广泛的自我或社区方法。