Departments of Gynecology and Obstetrics, and University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Deeley Research Center, BC Cancer Agency, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Clin Cancer Res. 2019 Apr 15;25(8):2537-2548. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3241. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
Tumors with high mutation load are thought to engender stronger immune responses, which in turn promote prolonged patient survival. To investigate this, we assessed tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and immunosuppressive factors across the 4 molecular subtypes of endometrial cancer, which have characteristic mutation rates ranging from low to ultra-high.
A total of 460 endometrial cancers were stratified by ProMisE (Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier in Endometrial cancer) into 4 molecular subtypes: mismatch repair-deficient (MMRd), mutant (POLE), p53 abnormal (p53abn), and p53 wild-type (p53wt). Immune markers (CD3, CD8, CD79a, CD138, PD-1, PD-L1, FoxP3, IDO-1) were quantified by multiplex IHC and tested for associations with ProMisE subtype, survival, and other clinicopathologic parameters.
Two major TIL patterns were observed. TIL tumors harbored dense T- and B-lineage infiltrates and multiple immunosuppressive features and were common in molecular subtypes associated with high mutation load (MMRd and POLE); however, equally strong responses were seen in significant numbers of p53abn and p53wt tumors, which have characteristically low mutation loads. TIL tumors were generally devoid of immunologic features and were more prevalent in p53abn and p53wt endometrial cancers, yet were also seen in MMRd and POLE subtypes. In multivariable models involving ProMisE subtype, T-cell markers, and TIL clusters, only ProMisE showed independent prognostic significance.
Immune response correlates with endometrial cancer molecular subtype but does not carry independent prognostic significance. Profound variation in immune response is seen across and within endometrial cancer molecular subtypes, suggesting that assessment of immune response rather than molecular subtype may better predict response to immunotherapy..
高突变负荷的肿瘤被认为会产生更强的免疫反应,进而促进患者的长期生存。为了研究这一点,我们评估了子宫内膜癌的 4 种分子亚型中的肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)和免疫抑制因子,这 4 种分子亚型的突变率从低到超高各不相同。
总共 460 例子宫内膜癌根据 ProMisE(子宫内膜癌主动分子风险分类器)分为 4 种分子亚型:错配修复缺陷(MMRd)、突变(POLE)、p53 异常(p53abn)和 p53 野生型(p53wt)。通过多重免疫组化定量检测免疫标志物(CD3、CD8、CD79a、CD138、PD-1、PD-L1、FoxP3、IDO-1),并检测其与 ProMisE 亚型、生存和其他临床病理参数的相关性。
观察到两种主要的 TIL 模式。TIL 肿瘤含有密集的 T 细胞和 B 细胞浸润和多种免疫抑制特征,常见于与高突变负荷相关的分子亚型(MMRd 和 POLE);然而,在大量 p53abn 和 p53wt 肿瘤中也观察到同样强烈的反应,这些肿瘤的突变负荷特征较低。TIL 肿瘤通常缺乏免疫特征,在 p53abn 和 p53wt 子宫内膜癌中更为常见,但也可见于 MMRd 和 POLE 亚型。在涉及 ProMisE 亚型、T 细胞标志物和 TIL 簇的多变量模型中,只有 ProMisE 显示出独立的预后意义。
免疫反应与子宫内膜癌的分子亚型相关,但不具有独立的预后意义。在子宫内膜癌的分子亚型中以及在各分子亚型内都存在明显的免疫反应变化,这表明评估免疫反应而不是分子亚型可能更好地预测免疫治疗的反应。