Davis Mark
The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Public Underst Sci. 2019 Apr;28(3):357-371. doi: 10.1177/0963662518817187. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
Online media has provided unprecedented opportunities for anti-vaccination groups to spread their message. An extensive scholarly literature has consequently emerged to analyse such discourse and develop strategies for countering it. In this article, I take a different approach. My contention is that it is no longer appropriate to approach anti-vaccination discourse as a stand-alone formation. Such sites, I argue, building on work by McKenzie Wark and Bart Cammaerts, are increasingly part of a wider proliferation of 'anti-public' discourse that contests fundamental democratic conventions, rules of argumentation and so on. The article uses a mixed methods approach based on a systematic content survey supplemented by the presentation of qualitative examples from 56 anti-vaccination websites. By locating anti-vaccination discourse in these broader contexts, I argue, it is possible to understand it as related to a more general transformation in public deliberation.
网络媒体为反疫苗接种团体传播其观点提供了前所未有的机会。因此,出现了大量学术文献来分析此类言论并制定应对策略。在本文中,我采用了一种不同的方法。我的观点是,将反疫苗接种言论视为一种独立的形式已不再合适。我认为,基于麦肯齐·沃克和巴特·卡马尔茨的研究成果,此类网站越来越成为更广泛的“反公众”言论扩散的一部分,这些言论对基本的民主惯例、论证规则等提出了质疑。本文采用了一种混合方法,基于系统的内容调查,并辅以从56个反疫苗接种网站中选取的定性示例。我认为,通过将反疫苗接种言论置于这些更广泛的背景中,可以将其理解为与公共审议中的更普遍转变相关。