University of Zurich, Switzerland.
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Jul;29(5):473-491. doi: 10.1177/0963662520924259. Epub 2020 Jun 9.
Populism is on the rise in many countries. Scholars have stated that it is characteristic for populism to describe society as a fundamental struggle between an allegedly virtuous people and political elites which are portrayed negatively. This anti-elitist sentiment not only targets politicians, however, but also other representatives of the alleged establishment-including scientists and scholarly institutions. But the specifics of such populism have not yet been conceptualized. We aim to do so, integrating scholarship on political populism, the "participatory turn," and alternative epistemologies. We propose to conceptualize science-related populism as a set of ideas which suggests that there is a morally charged antagonism between an (allegedly) virtuous ordinary people and an (allegedly) unvirtuous academic elite, and that this antagonism is due to the elite illegitimately claiming and the people legitimately demanding both science-related decision-making sovereignty and truth-speaking sovereignty.
民粹主义在许多国家抬头。学者们指出,民粹主义的特点是将社会描述为一场据称是正义的人民与被负面描绘的政治精英之间的根本斗争。这种反精英情绪不仅针对政治家,而且还针对所谓的当权派的其他代表,包括科学家和学术机构。但是,这种民粹主义的具体细节尚未概念化。我们旨在通过整合政治民粹主义、“参与转向”和替代认识论的研究来做到这一点。我们建议将与科学有关的民粹主义概念化为一系列观点,这些观点表明,在(据称)正直的普通民众和(据称)不正直的学术精英之间存在着一种道德上的对立,这种对立是由于精英们不合法地声称,而民众则合法地要求在与科学相关的决策主权和说实话主权方面拥有主权。