Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, United States.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University, St Louis, MO, United States.
J Geriatr Oncol. 2019 Mar;10(2):285-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 7.
Treatment of renal cell carcinoma has evolved with emphasis on nephron preservation for small renal masses. Our objective was to evaluate the proportions of treatment types for octogenarians with clinical stage 1 renal cell carcinoma.
The National Cancer Database was analyzed from 2004 to 2015. Patients with clinical stage 1, tumor size ≤ 7 cm, and age 80-89 years old were compared to a younger control arm of patients ≤ 70 years old. Treatment modality was categorized as radical nephrectomy (RN), partial nephrectomy (PN), percutaneous ablative therapy (PAT), and no treatment (NT). Primary outcome was treatment utilization over time using estimated annual percentage change (EAPC). Secondary outcomes included logistic regression for 30 day readmission after treatment and any definitive tumor treatment choice.
18,903 octogenarians were identified and compared to a control of 142,179 patients ≤ 70 years old. Overall, NT (36%) was the most common modality for octogenarians while PN (44.8%) was most common for the control arm. Using EAPC for octogenarians, we found increases for PAT (7.1%), PN (2.8%), and NT (1.6%) but a decrease for RN (-4.6%). EAPC for the younger cohort noted increases for PAT (6.8%), PN (5.4%), and NT (4.4%) but a decrease for RN (-5.5%).
For octogenarians with stage 1 renal cell carcinoma, minimally invasive treatments are increasingly utilized, while RN is decreasing. Compared to a younger cohort, a greater proportion of octogenarians are receiving NT. These findings remain encouraging for appropriate treatment of localized disease in patients with advanced age.
随着人们对小肾肿瘤保肾的重视,肾细胞癌的治疗方法也在不断发展。本研究旨在评估接受手术治疗的 80 岁及以上临床分期为 1 期肾细胞癌患者的治疗类型比例。
本研究对 2004 年至 2015 年国家癌症数据库的数据进行了分析。将临床分期为 1 期、肿瘤大小≤7cm、年龄 80-89 岁的患者与年龄≤70 岁的年轻对照组进行比较。治疗方式分为根治性肾切除术(RN)、部分肾切除术(PN)、经皮消融治疗(PAT)和未治疗(NT)。主要结局是通过估计年度百分比变化(EAPC)评估随时间推移的治疗方式利用情况。次要结局包括治疗后 30 天内再入院的 Logistic 回归分析和任何明确的肿瘤治疗选择。
共纳入 18903 例 80 岁及以上患者,并与年龄≤70 岁的 142179 例患者进行比较。总的来说,NT(36%)是 80 岁及以上患者最常见的治疗方式,而 PN(44.8%)是年轻对照组中最常见的治疗方式。对于 80 岁及以上患者,使用 EAPC 发现 PAT(7.1%)、PN(2.8%)和 NT(1.6%)的比例增加,而 RN(-4.6%)的比例下降。对于年轻患者,使用 EAPC 发现 PAT(6.8%)、PN(5.4%)和 NT(4.4%)的比例增加,而 RN(-5.5%)的比例下降。
对于临床分期为 1 期肾细胞癌的 80 岁及以上患者,微创治疗的应用越来越多,而 RN 的应用则在减少。与年轻患者相比,80 岁及以上患者中接受 NT 的比例更大。这些发现对于高龄患者局部疾病的适当治疗仍然是令人鼓舞的。