• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较田纳西州土地所有者对野猪管理方案的支持情况。

Comparing landowner support for wild hog management options in Tennessee.

机构信息

Department of Forestry, Wildlife, & Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA 37996.

USDOI National Park Service, Olympic National Park, Port Angeles, WA, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.075. Epub 2018 Dec 4.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.075
PMID:30529414
Abstract

Wild hogs (Sus scrofa) are an invasive, non-native species quickly gaining ground on private, as well as public, lands in Tennessee and much of the United States. Wildlife management personnel may benefit from assessing stakeholders' views towards various management options to control and eradicate wild hogs. A statewide mail survey of 5000 randomly selected landowners in Tennessee counties known to have wild hogs yielded 1620 completed responses (33% response rate). Using this dataset, an index of potential for conflict among landowner groups was computed for each of eleven management options, which varied from leaving the wild hogs alone, to both lethal and non-lethal options. Results indicate varying levels of potential for conflict depending on hunter status, wild hog hunter status, presence of wild hogs on land, percent of income derived from land, and amount of land damage caused by wild hogs. Overall, three management options including leaving the wild hogs alone, allowing sale of wild hogs, and capturing and relocating were found unacceptable whereas many other options including capturing and killing, providing technical assistance to landowners and educating people on preventing damage were found to have high level of acceptability and most consensus among landowner subgroups. Findings will be useful in understanding how support for wild hog control options vary across population segments, and which options are likely to see more or less resistance from certain landowners.

摘要

野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种入侵性的非本地物种,在美国田纳西州和许多其他州的私人和公共土地上迅速蔓延。野生动物管理人员可能会受益于评估利益相关者对各种管理选项的看法,以控制和根除野猪。对田纳西州已知有野猪的县的 5000 名随机选择的土地所有者进行了全州邮件调查,共收到 1620 份完整回复(回复率为 33%)。使用这个数据集,为十一种管理选项中的每一种计算了土地所有者群体之间潜在冲突的指数,这些选项从放任野猪不管到致死和非致死选项不等。结果表明,潜在冲突的程度因猎人身份、野猪猎人身份、土地上野猪的存在、土地收入的百分比以及野猪造成的土地损失量而异。总体而言,有三种管理选项包括放任野猪不管、允许出售野猪以及捕捉和转移被发现是不可接受的,而许多其他选项包括捕捉和杀死、向土地所有者提供技术援助以及教育人们防止损害的选项则被发现具有较高的可接受性和大多数土地所有者亚组之间的共识。这些发现将有助于了解对野猪控制选项的支持如何因人口群体而异,以及哪些选项可能会受到某些土地所有者的更多或更少的抵制。

相似文献

1
Comparing landowner support for wild hog management options in Tennessee.比较田纳西州土地所有者对野猪管理方案的支持情况。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.075. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
2
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
3
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
4
Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.生物监测和结果外展对私人土地所有者保护管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0194740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194740. eCollection 2018.
5
Classical Swine Fever in Wild Hog: Report of its Prevalence in Northeast India.野猪中的经典猪瘟:印度东北部地区的流行情况报告。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2016 Oct;63(5):540-7. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12298. Epub 2014 Nov 27.
6
Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.对私有土地所有者进行分类,以增进对城市森林景观中管理决策和保护机会的理解。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.128. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
7
Perpetual conservation easements and landowners: evaluating easement knowledge, satisfaction and partner organization relationships.永久性保护地役权与土地所有者:评估地役权知识、满意度及合作组织关系。
J Environ Manage. 2014 Dec 15;146:284-291. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.08.007. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
8
Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.理解对入侵物种的容忍度:对德克萨斯州野猪(Sus scrofa)猎人接受能力的调查。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
9
Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.评估美国公众对限制入侵性野猪(Sus scrofa)运输的支持程度。
J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.107. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
10
Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.土地所有者对协调一致的景观层面入侵物种控制的看法:社会与生态背景的作用
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.