• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。

Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.

机构信息

College of Forestry, Wildlife and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, 36849, USA.

Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Boise, ID, USA.

出版信息

Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8
PMID:38466407
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11023992/
Abstract

Successful management of invasive species often requires working across public and private landownerships. A prime example of an invasive species that commonly occurs on privately and publicly owned and managed lands is the wild pig (Sus scrofa). Because of the multitude of negative impacts associated with wild pigs, management must occur across both private and public lands to achieve widespread control and sustained success. However, managing wild pigs across property boundaries is challenging as we know very little about differing management practices and landowner perspectives. To address this knowledge gap, we sought to understand wild pig management efforts on privately owned lands, the perceived economic, ecological, and human health impact of wild pigs, and beliefs related to policy. Generally, stakeholders believe wild pigs have negative impacts on wildlife, the economy, and ecological and public health, however less than half of landowners participate in wild pig control. Furthermore, stakeholders believe that the responsibility of managing and paying for damages associated with wild pigs lies with individual landowners. Our findings suggest that increased efficacy of wild pig control and collaboration between private and public landowners is not only possible but also necessary if wild pig population control is to be regionally successful.

摘要

成功管理入侵物种通常需要跨越公共和私人土地所有权。一个常见的例子是野猪(Sus scrofa),它通常出现在私人和公共所有和管理的土地上。由于野猪带来了众多负面影响,因此必须在私人和公共土地上进行管理,以实现广泛的控制和持续的成功。然而,跨越财产边界管理野猪是具有挑战性的,因为我们对不同的管理实践和土地所有者的观点知之甚少。为了弥补这一知识空白,我们试图了解私人土地上的野猪管理工作、野猪对经济、生态和公共健康的感知影响,以及与政策相关的信念。一般来说,利益相关者认为野猪对野生动物、经济、生态和公共健康有负面影响,但不到一半的土地所有者参与野猪控制。此外,利益相关者认为,管理和支付与野猪相关的损害的责任在于个别土地所有者。我们的研究结果表明,如果要在该地区成功控制野猪数量,不仅有可能,而且有必要提高野猪控制的效果,并加强私人和公共土地所有者之间的合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/4f623dbdb39e/267_2024_1956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/5244168502e6/267_2024_1956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/56423878caf8/267_2024_1956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/577aece19790/267_2024_1956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/4f623dbdb39e/267_2024_1956_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/5244168502e6/267_2024_1956_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/56423878caf8/267_2024_1956_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/577aece19790/267_2024_1956_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8944/11023992/4f623dbdb39e/267_2024_1956_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
2
Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.利益相关者对使用毒物来管理野猪的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457. eCollection 2021.
3
Comparing landowner support for wild hog management options in Tennessee.比较田纳西州土地所有者对野猪管理方案的支持情况。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.075. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
4
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Cultural and regulatory factors influence distribution and trajectory of invasive species in the United States: A wild pig case study.文化和监管因素影响美国入侵物种的分布和轨迹:野猪案例研究。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jul 15;338:117742. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117742. Epub 2023 Mar 30.
6
Effects of biological monitoring and results outreach on private landowner conservation management.生物监测和结果外展对私人土地所有者保护管理的影响。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 4;13(4):e0194740. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194740. eCollection 2018.
7
Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.理解对入侵物种的容忍度:对德克萨斯州野猪(Sus scrofa)猎人接受能力的调查。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Selection of invasive wild pig countermeasures using multicriteria decision analysis.采用多准则决策分析选择入侵野猪对策。
Sci Total Environ. 2017 Jan 1;574:1164-1173. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.155. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
9
Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.土地所有者对协调一致的景观层面入侵物种控制的看法:社会与生态背景的作用
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
10
Changes in wild pig (Sus scrofa) relative abundance, crop damage, and environmental impacts in response to control efforts.野猪(Sus scrofa)相对丰度、作物损害及环境影响随控制措施的变化情况。
Pest Manag Sci. 2023 Dec;79(12):4765-4773. doi: 10.1002/ps.7671. Epub 2023 Jul 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Economic costs of biological invasions in the United States.美国生物入侵造成的经济成本。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Feb 1;806(Pt 3):151318. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151318. Epub 2021 Oct 30.
2
Understanding tolerance for an invasive species: An investigation of hunter acceptance capacity for wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in Texas.理解对入侵物种的容忍度:对德克萨斯州野猪(Sus scrofa)猎人接受能力的调查。
J Environ Manage. 2021 May 1;285:112143. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112143. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
3
Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.
利益相关者对使用毒物来管理野猪的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
5
Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States.模拟并绘制美国本土范围内入侵野猪出现概率的模型及分布图。
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 12;10(8):e0133771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133771. eCollection 2015.
6
The islands are different: human perceptions of game species in Hawaii.岛屿各有不同:夏威夷人类对狩猎物种的认知
Environ Manage. 2014 Oct;54(4):814-27. doi: 10.1007/s00267-014-0353-4. Epub 2014 Aug 17.
7
Understanding factors that influence stakeholder trust of natural resource science and institutions.理解影响利益相关者对自然资源科学和机构信任的因素。
Environ Manage. 2012 Mar;49(3):663-74. doi: 10.1007/s00267-011-9800-7. Epub 2012 Jan 1.
8
Invasive species, ecosystem services and human well-being.入侵物种、生态系统服务与人类福祉。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Sep;24(9):497-504. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.016. Epub 2009 Jul 3.
9
Brucella suis infection associated with feral swine hunting - three states, 2007-2008.2007 - 2008年,与野猪狩猎相关的猪布鲁氏菌感染 - 三个州
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009 Jun 12;58(22):618-21.