• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。

Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.

作者信息

Caplenor Carlotta A, Poudyal Neelam C, Muller Lisa I, Yoest Chuck

机构信息

Department of Forestry, Wildlife, & Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.

Department of Forestry, Wildlife, & Fisheries, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, United States.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022
PMID:28636972
Abstract

Wild hogs (Sus scrofa) are an invasive species with destructive habits, particularly rooting and wallowing, which can directly impact agricultural crops, pasture land, and water quality. Considering wild hogs are widely dispersed across the landscape, they are extremely difficult to control. Disagreements can arise among different stakeholders over whether and how their populations should be managed. The purpose of this article was to examine Tennessee, United States landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs, to compare acceptability of control methods, and to evaluate factors significantly influencing public support for regulations to control wild hogs. Logistic regression was employed to analyze data collected from a statewide survey of rural landowners in the fall of 2015. Landowners had overwhelmingly negative attitudes towards wild hogs, and were concerned about their impact on the natural environment and rural economy. Although landowners showed support for controlling wild hogs, levels of acceptability for management options varied. Respondents favored active management and supported education and incentive-based control programs to control wild hogs. Cognitive concepts such as social and personal norms and awareness of consequences, as well as demographic characteristics, significantly predicted landowners' support for state regulations to control wild hogs in Tennessee. Findings increase our understanding of the human dimensions of wild hog management and that of other similarly invasive animals, and may guide resource managers in designing effective and socially acceptable management strategies to control wild hog populations in Tennessee and elsewhere.

摘要

野猪(Sus scrofa)是一种具有破坏习性的入侵物种,尤其是拱地和打滚,这会直接影响农作物、牧场和水质。鉴于野猪广泛分布于整个区域,它们极难控制。不同利益相关者之间可能会在是否以及如何管理野猪种群的问题上产生分歧。本文的目的是研究美国田纳西州土地所有者对野猪的态度,比较控制方法的可接受性,并评估显著影响公众对控制野猪法规支持度的因素。采用逻辑回归分析2015年秋季从全州农村土地所有者调查中收集的数据。土地所有者对野猪持压倒性的负面态度,并担心它们对自然环境和农村经济的影响。尽管土地所有者表示支持控制野猪,但对管理方案的可接受程度各不相同。受访者赞成积极管理,并支持以教育和激励为基础的控制计划来控制野猪。社会和个人规范以及后果意识等认知概念,以及人口特征,显著预测了田纳西州土地所有者对该州控制野猪法规的支持度。研究结果增进了我们对野猪管理以及其他类似入侵动物的人类因素的理解,并可能指导资源管理者制定有效且社会可接受的管理策略,以控制田纳西州及其他地区的野猪种群。

相似文献

1
Assessing landowners' attitudes toward wild hogs and support for control options.评估土地所有者对野猪的态度以及对控制措施的支持度。
J Environ Manage. 2017 Oct 1;201:45-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.022. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
2
Comparing landowner support for wild hog management options in Tennessee.比较田纳西州土地所有者对野猪管理方案的支持情况。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:722-728. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.075. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
3
Private Landowners' Perspectives on Feral Swine and Regulation-Evidence from Arkansas, Louisiana, and East Texas.私人土地所有者对野猪和法规的看法——来自阿肯色州、路易斯安那州和东德克萨斯州的证据。
Environ Manage. 2023 Nov;72(5):1061-1071. doi: 10.1007/s00267-023-01879-w. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
5
Thinking Upstream: How Do Landowner Attitudes Affect Forested Riparian Buffer Coverage?上游思考:土地所有者的态度如何影响森林河岸带缓冲区的覆盖范围?
Environ Manage. 2020 May;65(5):689-701. doi: 10.1007/s00267-020-01271-y. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
6
Tasmanian landowner preferences for conservation incentive programs: a latent class approach.塔斯马尼亚地主对保护激励计划的偏好:潜在类别方法。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Oct;92(10):2647-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
7
Landowners' Perspectives on Coordinated, Landscape-Level Invasive Species Control: The Role of Social and Ecological Context.土地所有者对协调一致的景观层面入侵物种控制的看法:社会与生态背景的作用
Environ Manage. 2017 Mar;59(3):477-489. doi: 10.1007/s00267-016-0807-y. Epub 2017 Jan 11.
8
Assessing public support for restrictions on transport of invasive wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in the United States.评估美国公众对限制入侵性野猪(Sus scrofa)运输的支持程度。
J Environ Manage. 2019 May 1;237:488-494. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.107. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
9
Classifying private landowners to improve understanding of management decisions and conservation opportunities in urbanizing forested landscapes.对私有土地所有者进行分类,以增进对城市森林景观中管理决策和保护机会的理解。
J Environ Manage. 2019 Feb 15;232:751-758. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.128. Epub 2018 Dec 4.
10
Quantifying trade-offs between ecological gains, economic costs, and landowners' preferences in boreal mire protection.量化北方泥炭地保护中生态收益、经济成本和土地所有者偏好之间的权衡。
Ambio. 2021 Oct;50(10):1841-1850. doi: 10.1007/s13280-021-01530-0. Epub 2021 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Novel insights into the cognitive, emotional, and experiential dimensions of stakeholder acceptance of wildlife management.对利益相关者接受野生动物管理的认知、情感和体验维度的新见解。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 27;14(1):29479. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-80661-2.
2
Perceptions of Wild Pig Impact, Management, and Policy in Alabama.阿拉巴马州野猪影响、管理和政策认知。
Environ Manage. 2024 May;73(5):1032-1048. doi: 10.1007/s00267-024-01956-8. Epub 2024 Mar 11.
3
Do People Care about the Origin of Wildlife? The Role of Social Stereotypes on Public Preference for Exotic Animals.
人们关心野生动物的来源吗?社会刻板印象对公众对外来动物偏好的影响。
Animals (Basel). 2022 Aug 23;12(17):2160. doi: 10.3390/ani12172160.
4
Is Hay for the Birds? Investigating Landowner Willingness to Time Hay Harvests for Grassland Bird Conservation.干草是给鸟类准备的吗?调查土地所有者为保护草原鸟类而选择干草收割时间的意愿。
Animals (Basel). 2021 Apr 5;11(4):1030. doi: 10.3390/ani11041030.
5
Stakeholder perspectives towards the use of toxicants for managing wild pigs.利益相关者对使用毒物来管理野猪的看法。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 5;16(2):e0246457. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246457. eCollection 2021.
6
Framework for assessing vertebrate invasive species damage: the case of feral swine in the United States.评估脊椎动物入侵物种危害的框架:以美国野猪为例。
Biol Invasions. 2020;22(10):3101-3117. doi: 10.1007/s10530-020-02311-8. Epub 2020 Jul 10.