Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Leibniz-Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries, Müggelseedamm 310, 12587 Berlin, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Mar 15;656:797-807. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.348. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
Freshwater biodiversity is declining, despite national and international efforts to manage and protect freshwater ecosystems. Ecosystem-based management (EBM) has been proposed as an approach that could more efficiently and adaptively balance ecological and societal needs. However, this raises the question of how social and ecological objectives can be included in an integrated management plan. Here, we present a generic model-coupling framework tailored to address this question for freshwater ecosystems, using three components: biodiversity, ecosystem services (ESS), and a spatial prioritisation that aims to balance the spatial representation of biodiversity and ESS supply and demand. We illustrate this model-coupling approach within the Danube River Basin using the spatially explicit, potential distribution of (i) 85 fish species as a surrogate for biodiversity as modelled using hierarchical Bayesian models, and (ii) four estimated ESS layers produced by the Artificial Intelligence for Ecosystem Services (ARIES) platform (with ESS supply defined as carbon storage and flood regulation, and demand specified as recreation and water use). These are then used for (iii) a joint spatial prioritisation of biodiversity and ESS employing Marxan with Zones, laying out the spatial representation of multiple management zones. Given the transboundary setting of the Danube River Basin, we also run comparative analyses including the country-level purchasing power parity (PPP)-adjusted gross domestic product (GDP) and each country's percent cover of the total basin area as potential cost factors, illustrating a scheme for balancing the share of establishing specific zones among countries. We demonstrate how emphasizing various biodiversity or ESS targets in an EBM model-coupling framework can be used to cost-effectively test various spatially explicit management options across a multi-national case study. We further discuss possible limitations, future developments, and requirements for effectively managing a balance between biodiversity and ESS supply and demand in freshwater ecosystems.
尽管国家和国际上都在努力管理和保护淡水生态系统,但淡水生物多样性仍在不断减少。基于生态系统的管理(EBM)被提议作为一种能够更有效地和适应性地平衡生态和社会需求的方法。然而,这就提出了一个问题,即如何在综合管理计划中纳入社会和生态目标。在这里,我们提出了一个通用的模型耦合框架,旨在针对淡水生态系统解决这个问题,该框架使用了三个组件:生物多样性、生态系统服务(ESS)和空间优先级排序,旨在平衡生物多样性和 ESS 供应和需求的空间代表性。我们使用分层贝叶斯模型模拟的(i)85 种鱼类物种的潜在分布作为生物多样性的替代指标,以及(ii)人工智能生态系统服务(ARIES)平台生成的四个估计的 ESS 层(ESS 供应定义为碳储存和洪水调节,需求指定为娱乐和水利用),在多瑙河流域内说明了这种模型耦合方法。然后,我们使用(iii)马克思安与区域结合进行生物多样性和 ESS 的联合空间优先级排序,规划多个管理区域的空间代表性。考虑到多瑙河流域的跨界背景,我们还进行了比较分析,包括国家层面的购买力平价(PPP)调整国内生产总值(GDP)和每个国家对流域总面积的百分比覆盖作为潜在成本因素,说明了在国家之间平衡建立特定区域份额的方案。我们展示了如何在 EBM 模型耦合框架中强调各种生物多样性或 ESS 目标,以有效地测试跨国案例研究中的各种空间明确的管理选项。我们进一步讨论了可能的限制、未来的发展和有效管理淡水生态系统中生物多样性和 ESS 供应和需求之间平衡的要求。