Biodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Research Group, International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), Schlosspark 1, Laxenburg, 2361, Austria.
Biodiversity Chair, MED: Mediterranean Institute for Agriculture, Environment and Development, 7006-554, University of Evora, Portugal.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2024 May 27;379(1902):20230015. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0015. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
Expanding and managing current habitat and species protection measures is at the heart of the European biodiversity strategy. A structured approach is needed to gain insights into such issues is systematic conservation planning, which uses techniques from decision theory to identify places and actions that contribute most effectively to policy objectives given a set of constraints. Yet culturally and historically determined European landscapes make the implementation of any conservation plans challenging, requiring an analysis of synergies and trade-offs before implementation. In this work, we review the scientific literature for evidence of previous conservation planning approaches, highlighting recent advances and success stories. We find that the conceptual characteristics of European conservation planning studies likely reduced their potential in contributing to better-informed decisions. We outline pathways towards improving the uptake of decision theory and multi-criteria conservation planning at various scales, particularly highlighting the need for (a) open data and intuitive tools, (b) the integration of biodiversity-focused conservation planning with multiple objectives, (c) accounting of dynamic ecological processes and functions, and (d) better facilitation of entry-points and co-design practices of conservation planning scenarios with stakeholders. By adopting and improving these practices, European conservation planning might become more actionable and adaptable towards implementable policy outcomes. This article is part of the theme issue 'Ecological novelty and planetary stewardship: biodiversity dynamics in a transforming biosphere'.
扩大和管理当前的栖息地和物种保护措施是欧洲生物多样性战略的核心。需要一种结构化的方法来深入了解这些问题,系统保护规划就是一种方法,它利用决策理论的技术来确定在给定的一系列约束条件下,哪些地方和行动最有效地有助于实现政策目标。然而,欧洲受文化和历史影响的景观使得实施任何保护计划都具有挑战性,在实施之前需要对协同作用和权衡取舍进行分析。在这项工作中,我们回顾了科学文献中关于先前保护规划方法的证据,强调了最近的进展和成功案例。我们发现,欧洲保护规划研究的概念特征可能降低了其为更好的决策提供信息的潜力。我们概述了在不同尺度上提高决策理论和多标准保护规划采用率的途径,特别是强调了以下方面的必要性:(a)开放数据和直观工具;(b)将以生物多样性为重点的保护规划与多个目标相结合;(c)考虑动态生态过程和功能;(d)更好地促进与利益相关者共同设计保护规划情景的切入点。通过采用和改进这些实践,欧洲的保护规划可能会变得更具可操作性和适应性,以实现可执行的政策成果。本文是“生态新颖性和行星管理:不断变化的生物圈中的生物多样性动态”主题问题的一部分。