• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

气道压力释放通气不会增加肺顺应性差的创伤性脑损伤患者的颅内压。

Airway pressure release ventilation does not increase intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury with poor lung compliance.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma and Critical Care, 96 Jonathan Lucas St. CSB 416, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

Department of Neurosurgery, 96 Jonathan Lucas St. Room 301 CSB, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.

出版信息

J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Dec 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.034
PMID:30530262
Abstract

The use of Airway Pressure Release Ventilation (APRV) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. Some believe that elevated mean airway pressures transmitted to the thorax may cause clinically significant increases in Central Venous Pressure (CVP) and intracranial pressure (ICP) from venous congestion. We perform a retrospective review from 2009 to 2015 of traumatically injured patients who were transitioned from traditional ventilator modes to APRV and also had an ICP monitor in place. Fifteen patients undergoing 19 transitions to APRV were identified. Prior to transitioning to APRV the average static and dynamic compliance was 22.9 +/- 5.6 and 16.5 +/- 4.12 mL/cm H2O. There was no statistical difference in ICP, MAP, and CPP prior to and after transition to APRV. There was a statistically significant increase in CVP, PaO2, and P:F ratio. Individually, only 4 patients had ICP values >20 in the first hour after transitioning to APRV and the rate of ICP elevations was similar between the two modes of ventilation. These data show that APRV is a viable mode of ventilation in patients with TBI who have low lung compliance. The increased CVP of this mode of ventilation did not affect ICP or hemodynamic parameters.

摘要

在创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 患者中使用气道压力释放通气 (APRV) 仍然存在争议。一些人认为,传递到胸部的升高的平均气道压力可能会导致中央静脉压 (CVP) 和颅内压 (ICP) 因静脉充血而出现临床显著增加。我们对 2009 年至 2015 年期间从传统呼吸机模式转换为 APRV 且有 ICP 监测仪的创伤性损伤患者进行了回顾性研究。确定了 15 名患者进行了 19 次 APRV 转换。在转换为 APRV 之前,平均静态和动态顺应性分别为 22.9±5.6 和 16.5±4.12 mL/cm H2O。在转换为 APRV 之前和之后,ICP、MAP 和 CPP 没有统计学差异。CVP、PaO2 和 P:F 比值均有统计学显著增加。仅 4 名患者在转换为 APRV 后的第一个小时内 ICP 值>20,两种通气模式的 ICP 升高率相似。这些数据表明,APRV 是低肺顺应性 TBI 患者可行的通气模式。这种通气模式的 CVP 升高不会影响 ICP 或血液动力学参数。

相似文献

1
Airway pressure release ventilation does not increase intracranial pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury with poor lung compliance.气道压力释放通气不会增加肺顺应性差的创伤性脑损伤患者的颅内压。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:118-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.034. Epub 2018 Dec 3.
2
Changes in Therapeutic Intensity Level Following Airway Pressure Release Ventilation in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury.严重创伤性脑损伤后气道压力释放通气治疗强度的变化。
J Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;33(3):196-202. doi: 10.1177/0885066616669315. Epub 2016 Sep 20.
3
[The clinical effect of airway pressure release ventilation for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome].气道压力释放通气对急性肺损伤/急性呼吸窘迫综合征的临床疗效
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2016 Jan;28(1):15-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2016.01.004.
4
Lung protective ventilation (ARDSNet) versus airway pressure release ventilation: ventilatory management in a combined model of acute lung and brain injury.肺保护性通气(急性呼吸窘迫综合征网络方案)与气道压力释放通气:急性肺损伤和脑损伤联合模型中的通气管理
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Feb;78(2):240-9; discussion 249-51. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000518.
5
Early application of airway pressure release ventilation may reduce the duration of mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome.早期应用气道压力释放通气可能会降低急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者机械通气的时间。
Intensive Care Med. 2017 Nov;43(11):1648-1659. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4912-z. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
6
Does airway pressure release ventilation alter lung function after acute lung injury?急性肺损伤后气道压力释放通气是否会改变肺功能?
Chest. 1995 Mar;107(3):805-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.107.3.805.
7
The impact of spontaneous ventilation on distribution of lung aeration in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: airway pressure release ventilation versus pressure support ventilation.自主通气对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者肺通气分布的影响:气道压力释放通气与压力支持通气的比较
Anesth Analg. 2009 Dec;109(6):1892-900. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bbd918.
8
Preliminary experience with airway pressure release ventilation in a trauma/surgical intensive care unit.创伤/外科重症监护病房应用气道压力释放通气的初步经验。
J Trauma. 2005 Jul;59(1):71-6. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200507000-00010.
9
Early airway pressure release ventilation prevents ARDS-a novel preventive approach to lung injury.早期气道压力释放通气预防 ARDS-一种新的肺损伤预防方法。
Shock. 2013 Jan;39(1):28-38. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31827b47bb.
10
Airway pressure release ventilation during acute lung injury: a prospective multicenter trial.急性肺损伤期间的气道压力释放通气:一项前瞻性多中心试验。
Crit Care Med. 1991 Oct;19(10):1234-41. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199110000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Does airway pressure release ventilation offer new hope for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome?气道压力释放通气能否为治疗急性呼吸窘迫综合征带来新希望?
J Intensive Med. 2022 Mar 28;2(4):241-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2022.02.003. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Airway pressure release ventilation.气道压力释放通气。
BJA Educ. 2020 Mar;20(3):80-88. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2019.12.001. Epub 2020 Jan 23.