Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Fam Pract. 2019 Oct 8;36(5):587-593. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmy124.
Advance care planning (ACP) is a crucial element of palliative care. It improves the quality of end-of-life care and reduces aggressive and needless life-prolonging medical interventions. However, little is known about its application in daily practice. This study aims to examine the application of ACP for patients with cancer in general practice.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in 11 general practices in the Netherlands. Electronic patient records (EPRs) of deceased patients with colorectal or lung cancer were analysed. Data on ACP documentation, correspondence between medical specialist and GP, and health care use in the last year of life were extracted.
Records of 163 deceased patients were analysed. In 74% of the records, one or more ACP items were registered. GPs especially documented patients' preferences for euthanasia (58%), palliative sedation (46%) and preferred place of death (26%). Per patient, GPs received on average six letters from medical specialists. These letters mainly contained information regarding medical treatment and rarely ACP items. In the last year of life, patients contacted the GP over 30 times, and 51% visited the emergency department at least once, of whom 54% in the last month.
Registration of ACP items in GPs' EPRs appeared to be limited. ACP elements were rarely subject of communication between primary and secondary care, which may impact the continuity of patient care during the last year of life. More emphasis on registration of ACP items and better exchange of information regarding patients' preferences are needed.
预先医疗照护计划(ACP)是缓和医疗的重要一环。它可以提高临终关怀的质量,减少不必要的激进的延长生命的医疗干预。然而,ACP 在日常实践中的应用鲜为人知。本研究旨在探讨 ACP 在一般实践中对癌症患者的应用。
我们在荷兰的 11 家一般实践中进行了回顾性队列研究。分析了已去世的结直肠癌或肺癌患者的电子病历(EPR)。提取了关于 ACP 文件记录、医疗专家与家庭医生之间的通信以及患者生命最后一年的医疗保健使用的数据。
分析了 163 名已故患者的记录。在 74%的记录中,记录了一个或多个 ACP 项目。家庭医生特别记录了患者对安乐死(58%)、缓和性镇静(46%)和首选死亡地点(26%)的偏好。每位患者平均收到来自医疗专家的六封信件。这些信件主要包含关于医疗治疗的信息,很少涉及 ACP 项目。在生命的最后一年,患者联系家庭医生超过 30 次,51%的患者至少一次去急诊,其中 54%是在最后一个月。
家庭医生的 EPR 中 ACP 项目的记录似乎有限。ACP 要素很少成为初级和二级保健之间沟通的主题,这可能会影响患者生命最后一年的护理连续性。需要更加重视 ACP 项目的记录和更好地交流患者偏好的信息。