Department of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Satakunta Hospital District, Pori, Finland.
J Clin Nurs. 2020 Jul;29(13-14):2069-2082. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15216. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
To describe advance care planning (ACP) for patients with cancer in palliative care from professionals' perspective.
The number of patients with cancer is increasing. Palliative care should be based on timely ACP so that patients receive the care they prefer.
A scoping review.
A systematic literature search was conducted in January 2019. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) checklist was used. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools. Data were analysed with content analysis.
Of 739 studies identified, 12 were eligible for inclusion. The settings were inpatient and outpatient facilities in special and primary care including oncology, palliative and hospice care. ACP consisted of patient-oriented issues, current and future treatment, and end-of-life matters. The participants were nursing, medical or social professionals. ACP conversations rarely occurred; if they did, they took place at the onset, throughout and late in the cancer.
Professionals could not separate day-to-day care planning and ACP. ACP documentation was scattered and difficult to find and use. Professionals were unfamiliar with ACP, and established practices were lacking. ACP conversations mostly occurred in late cancer. Further research clarifying concepts and exploring the significance of ACP for patients and relatives is recommended.
Our results support the use of ACP by a multidisciplinary team from the early stages of cancer as a discussion forum around patients' wishes and choices. We showed the need to raise professionals' awareness of ACP. Education and appropriate data tools for ACP are important as they may reduce reluctance and promote ACP use. This paper contributes to the wider global clinical community by pointing out the importance of standardising ACP contents and practices.
从专业人员的角度描述姑息治疗中癌症患者的预先医疗照护计划(ACP)。
癌症患者的数量不断增加。姑息治疗应该基于及时的 ACP,以便患者得到他们所期望的护理。
范围综述。
2019 年 1 月进行了系统的文献检索。使用了系统综述和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)清单。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)批判性评估工具评估研究的方法学质量。使用内容分析法对数据进行分析。
在确定的 739 项研究中,有 12 项符合纳入标准。这些研究的地点包括特殊和初级保健中的住院和门诊设施,包括肿瘤学、姑息治疗和临终关怀。ACP 包括以患者为中心的问题、当前和未来的治疗以及生命末期的问题。参与者是护理、医疗或社会专业人员。ACP 对话很少发生;如果发生,它们发生在癌症的开始、整个过程中和晚期。
专业人员无法将日常护理计划和 ACP 分开。ACP 文件分散且难以查找和使用。专业人员对 ACP 不熟悉,也缺乏既定的做法。ACP 对话主要发生在晚期癌症。建议进一步研究以澄清概念并探索 ACP 对患者和家属的意义。
我们的结果支持由多学科团队从癌症早期开始使用 ACP,作为围绕患者意愿和选择的讨论论坛。我们表明需要提高专业人员对 ACP 的认识。ACP 的教育和适当的数据工具很重要,因为它们可以减少抵触情绪并促进 ACP 的使用。本文通过指出标准化 ACP 内容和实践的重要性,为更广泛的全球临床社区做出了贡献。