Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, 40 Ruskin Street, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Europace. 2019 May 1;21(5):708-715. doi: 10.1093/europace/euy285.
Electrical cardioversion is commonly performed to restore sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), but it is unsuccessful in 10-12% of attempts. We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a novel cardioversion protocol for this arrhythmia.
Consecutive elective cardioversion attempts for AF between October 2012 and July 2017 at a tertiary cardiovascular centre before (Phase I) and after (Phase II) implementing the Ottawa AF cardioversion protocol (OAFCP) as an institutional initiative in July 2015 were evaluated. The primary outcome was cardioversion success, defined as ≥2 consecutive sinus beats or atrial-paced beats in patients with implanted cardiac devices. Secondary outcomes were first shock success, sustained success (sinus or atrial-paced rhythm on 12-lead electrocardiogram prior to discharge from hospital), and procedural complications. Cardioversion was successful in 459/500 (91.8%) in Phase I compared with 386/389 (99.2%) in Phase II (P < 0.001). This improvement persisted after adjusting for age, body mass index, amiodarone use, and transthoracic impedance using modified Poisson regression [adjusted relative risk 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-1.11; P < 0.001] and when analysed as an interrupted time series (change in level +9.5%, 95% CI 6.8-12.1%; P < 0.001). The OAFCP was also associated with greater first shock success (88.4% vs. 79.2%; P < 0.001) and sustained success (91.6% vs 84.7%; P=0.002). No serious complications occurred.
Implementing the OAFCP was associated with a 7.4% absolute increase in cardioversion success and increases in first shock and sustained success without serious procedural complications. Its use could safely improve cardioversion success in patients with AF.
www.clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT02192957.
电复律常用于恢复心房颤动(AF)患者的窦性节律,但成功率为 10-12%。我们旨在评估一种新型复律方案对此类心律失常的有效性和安全性。
本研究连续评估了 2012 年 10 月至 2017 年 7 月在一家三级心血管中心行择期电复律治疗的 AF 患者,根据在 2015 年 7 月作为机构倡议实施渥太华 AF 电复律方案(OAFCP)前后(I 期和 II 期)分为两组。主要结局是电复律成功,定义为植入式心脏装置患者至少连续出现 2 次窦性心搏或心房起搏心搏。次要结局包括首次电击成功、持续成功(出院前 12 导联心电图显示窦性或心房起搏节律)和操作并发症。I 期电复律成功率为 459/500(91.8%),而 II 期为 386/389(99.2%)(P<0.001)。调整年龄、体重指数、胺碘酮使用和经胸阻抗后,使用校正泊松回归(校正后相对风险 1.08,95%置信区间[CI]1.05-1.11;P<0.001)和作为中断时间序列(水平变化+9.5%,95%CI 6.8-12.1%;P<0.001)后,该改善仍然存在。OAFCP 还与更高的首次电击成功(88.4% vs. 79.2%;P<0.001)和持续成功(91.6% vs. 84.7%;P=0.002)相关。未发生严重并发症。
实施 OAFCP 与电复律成功率绝对增加 7.4%相关,首次电击和持续成功增加,无严重操作并发症。它的使用可以安全地提高 AF 患者的电复律成功率。
www.clinicaltrials.gov ID:NCT02192957。