• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

针对关系困扰的面对面干预和网络干预的相对成本效益

Relative Cost Effectiveness of In-Person and Internet Interventions for Relationship Distress.

作者信息

Georgia Salivar Emily J, Rothman Karen, Roddy McKenzie K, Doss Brian D

机构信息

College of Psychology, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL.

Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

出版信息

Fam Process. 2020 Mar;59(1):66-80. doi: 10.1111/famp.12414. Epub 2018 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1111/famp.12414
PMID:30537091
Abstract

While the efficacy of couple therapy has been repeatedly demonstrated, most distressed couples do not seek treatment. To improve reach and overcome barriers to therapy, Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy (IBCT) was translated into a web-based program, OurRelationship (OR). While both IBCT and OR have been shown to improve relationship and individual functioning, the goal of the present study was to compare the relative cost effectiveness of these two treatment modalities. In IBCT, 74% of couples experienced reliable improvement, compared to 55% of couples in OR. Within-group Cohen's d effect sizes during treatment for relationship satisfaction were d = 0.87 for IBCT and d = 0.96 for OR. Relative cost effectiveness analyses revealed that even at the highest expense estimates for OR and the lowest expense estimates for IBCT, OR was more cost effective in creating reliable improvement once at least 229 couples were served and was more cost effective in creating large-size effects once at least 153 couples were served. Cost-effectiveness increases for both IBCT and OR as more couples are served; however, this cost savings occurs at a much more rapid rate for OR. These findings demonstrate that despite higher initial development costs, Internet programs are a cost-effective option for dissemination either as a stand-alone service or as an initial intervention in a stepped care model with more intensive in-person services.

摘要

虽然夫妻治疗的疗效已得到反复证明,但大多数处于困扰中的夫妻并未寻求治疗。为了扩大覆盖面并克服治疗障碍,整合行为夫妻治疗(IBCT)被转化为一个基于网络的项目“我们的关系”(OR)。虽然IBCT和OR都已被证明能改善关系和个人功能,但本研究的目的是比较这两种治疗方式的相对成本效益。在IBCT中,74%的夫妻有可靠的改善,而在OR中这一比例为55%。治疗期间关系满意度的组内科恩d效应量,IBCT为d = 0.87,OR为d = 0.96。相对成本效益分析显示,即使按照OR的最高费用估计和IBCT的最低费用估计,一旦至少为229对夫妻提供服务,OR在产生可靠改善方面更具成本效益,一旦至少为153对夫妻提供服务,OR在产生大效应方面更具成本效益。随着服务的夫妻数量增加,IBCT和OR的成本效益都会提高;然而,OR的成本节约速度要快得多。这些发现表明,尽管初始开发成本较高,但互联网项目作为独立服务或在逐步护理模式中作为初始干预措施,与更密集的面对面服务相结合,是一种具有成本效益的传播选择。

相似文献

1
Relative Cost Effectiveness of In-Person and Internet Interventions for Relationship Distress.针对关系困扰的面对面干预和网络干预的相对成本效益
Fam Process. 2020 Mar;59(1):66-80. doi: 10.1111/famp.12414. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
2
Integrative Behavioral Couple Therapy: Theoretical Background, Empirical Research, and Dissemination.综合行为夫妻治疗:理论背景、实证研究与传播
Fam Process. 2016 Sep;55(3):408-22. doi: 10.1111/famp.12223. Epub 2016 May 26.
3
Marital status and satisfaction five years following a randomized clinical trial comparing traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy.婚姻状况和满意度五年后随机临床试验比较传统与综合行为夫妻治疗。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):225-35. doi: 10.1037/a0018132.
4
A Randomized Controlled Trial of Coach Contact During a Brief Online Intervention for Distressed Couples.一项针对在线干预受困扰夫妻中教练联系的随机对照试验。
Fam Process. 2017 Dec;56(4):835-851. doi: 10.1111/famp.12262. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
5
A randomized controlled trial of the web-based OurRelationship program: Effects on relationship and individual functioning.基于网络的OurRelationship项目的随机对照试验:对人际关系和个人功能的影响。
J Consult Clin Psychol. 2016 Apr;84(4):285-96. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000063. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
6
A Comparison of Low-Income Versus Higher-Income Individuals Seeking an Online Relationship Intervention.寻求在线恋爱关系干预的低收入者与高收入者比较。
Fam Process. 2020 Dec;59(4):1434-1446. doi: 10.1111/famp.12503. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
7
Improvements in coparenting conflict and child adjustment following an online program for relationship distress.关系困扰在线项目对亲代冲突和儿童适应的改善。
J Fam Psychol. 2020 Feb;34(1):68-78. doi: 10.1037/fam0000582. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
8
Couples with Intimate Partner Violence Seeking Relationship Help: Associations and Implications for Self-Help and Online Interventions.夫妻暴力寻求关系帮助:对自助和在线干预的关联和影响。
Fam Process. 2018 Jun;57(2):293-307. doi: 10.1111/famp.12291. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Maintenance of Relationship and Individual Functioning Gains Following Online Relationship Programs for Low-Income Couples.维持关系和个人功能的增益:为低收入夫妇提供在线关系项目后的结果。
Fam Process. 2021 Mar;60(1):102-118. doi: 10.1111/famp.12541. Epub 2020 Apr 30.
10
Trajectories of relationship and individual functioning among waitlisted couples for an online relationship intervention.候补夫妇参与在线关系干预的关系轨迹和个体功能。
Fam Process. 2021 Dec;60(4):1233-1248. doi: 10.1111/famp.12691. Epub 2021 Jul 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability and fidelity of a media literacy education-based, comprehensive sexual health program for college students: A multi-method student-centered evaluation.一项以媒体素养教育为基础的大学生综合性性健康项目的可接受性与保真度:一项以学生为中心的多方法评估。
Am J Sex Educ. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.1080/15546128.2024.2415308.
2
Comparing the OurRelationship Program and Bibliotherapy for Parents Experiencing Couple Distress: A Randomized Pilot.比较针对经历夫妻关系困扰的父母的“我们的关系”项目与阅读疗法:一项随机试点研究。
J Marital Fam Ther. 2025 Jan;51(1):e12762. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12762.
3
A randomized controlled trial of the online OurRelationship program with varying levels of coach support.
一项针对不同教练支持水平的在线“我们的关系”项目的随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2023 Aug 28;34:100661. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2023.100661. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
New developments during the COVID-19 pandemic: Drama therapy as an online psychological intervention tool.新冠疫情期间的新进展:戏剧疗法作为一种在线心理干预工具。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 10;13:930002. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.930002. eCollection 2022.
5
COVID Couple Therapy: Telehealth and Somatic Action Techniques.新冠疫情下的夫妻治疗:远程医疗与躯体行动技术
Aust N Z J Fam Ther. 2022 Jun;43(2):197-209. doi: 10.1002/anzf.1487. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Efficacy of the web-based PaarBalance program on relationship satisfaction, depression and anxiety - A randomized controlled trial.基于网络的PaarBalance项目对关系满意度、抑郁和焦虑的疗效——一项随机对照试验。
Internet Interv. 2020 Dec 29;23:100360. doi: 10.1016/j.invent.2020.100360. eCollection 2021 Mar.
7
COVID-19, Families, and Family Therapy: Shining Light into the Darkness.新型冠状病毒肺炎、家庭与家庭治疗:为黑暗带来光明
Fam Process. 2020 Sep;59(3):825-831. doi: 10.1111/famp.12590. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Relational Lockdown and Relational Trauma in the Time of Coronavirus: A Reflection from a UK Family Therapist.冠状病毒时期的关系禁闭和关系创伤:一位英国家庭治疗师的反思。
Fam Process. 2020 Sep;59(3):1024-1033. doi: 10.1111/famp.12571. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
9
Family in the Age of COVID-19.新冠疫情时代的家庭
Fam Process. 2020 Jun;59(2):309-312. doi: 10.1111/famp.12543. Epub 2020 May 15.
10
Improved Child Mental Health Following Brief Relationship Enhancement and Co-Parenting Interventions During the Transition to Parenthood.育儿过渡期内简短的增进关系和共同养育干预可改善儿童心理健康。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 25;17(3):766. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030766.