The present study compares the feasibility and acceptability of two asynchronous, interactive, 2-3-hour, online interventions: , which is a comprehensive sex education program, taught from a media literacy perspective and , which is a comprehensive sex education program containing identical sexual health content, but no media literacy content. Among = 649 community college students, both programs were equivalently high in program fidelity (88% completed all lessons) and acceptability (average 90% positive ratings). Qualitative analyses revealed that both programs were informative and usable, with few criticisms besides program length. Results suggest, both programs represent promising approaches to sex education for college students.