• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童会参与竞争型利他主义行为。

Children engage in competitive altruism.

机构信息

Minerva Research Group of Origin of Human Self-Regulation, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Department of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA; Department of Developmental Psychology, Georg-Elias Müller Institute of Psychology, University of Göttingen, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;179:176-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.008
PMID:30537568
Abstract

Humans cultivate their reputations as good cooperators, sometimes even competing with group mates, to appear most cooperative to individuals during the process of selecting partners. To investigate the ontogenetic origins of such "competitive altruism," we presented 5- and 8-year-old children with a dyadic sharing game in which both children simultaneously decided how many rewards to share with each other. The children were either observed by a third-person peer or not. In addition, the children either knew that one of them would be picked for a subsequent collaborative game or had no such knowledge. We found that by 8 years of age, children were more generous in the sharing game not only when their behavior was observed by a third party but also when it could affect their chances of being chosen for a subsequent game. This is the first demonstration of competitive altruism in young children, and as such it underscores the important role of partner choice (and individual awareness of the process) in encouraging human cooperation from an early age.

摘要

人类培养自己善于合作的声誉,有时甚至与团队成员竞争,以在选择合作伙伴的过程中让个人看起来最具合作性。为了探究这种“竞争利他主义”的个体发生起源,我们向 5 岁和 8 岁的儿童呈现了一个二元共享游戏,在这个游戏中,两个孩子同时决定彼此之间分享多少奖励。儿童要么被一个第三人同伴观察,要么不被观察。此外,孩子们要么知道他们中的一个将被选中参加随后的合作游戏,要么不知道。我们发现,到 8 岁时,孩子们在分享游戏中更加慷慨大方,不仅当他们的行为被第三方观察到时,而且当他们的行为可以影响他们被选中参加随后游戏的机会时。这是在幼儿中首次证明竞争利他主义,因此它强调了伙伴选择(以及个人对这一过程的意识)在鼓励人类从小就进行合作方面的重要作用。

相似文献

1
Children engage in competitive altruism.儿童会参与竞争型利他主义行为。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Mar;179:176-189. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.008. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
2
Partner choice creates competitive altruism in humans.伴侣选择在人类中产生了竞争性利他行为。
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 7;274(1610):749-53. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.0209.
3
Gossip and competitive altruism support cooperation in a Public Good game.流言蜚语和竞争利他主义支持公共物品博弈中的合作。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0303. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
4
Why Hate the Good Guy? Antisocial Punishment of High Cooperators Is Greater When People Compete To Be Chosen.为何恨好人?当人们竞争被选中时,对高合作者的反社会惩罚会更大。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):868-876. doi: 10.1177/0956797617752642. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
5
Cooperators benefit through reputation-based partner choice in economic games.合作者通过基于声誉的经济博弈中的伙伴选择而受益。
Biol Lett. 2010 Oct 23;6(5):659-62. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0209. Epub 2010 Apr 21.
6
Playing a cooperative game promotes preschoolers' sharing with third-parties, but not social inclusion.玩合作游戏可以促进学龄前儿童与第三方分享,但不能促进社会包容。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 19;14(8):e0221092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221092. eCollection 2019.
7
Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game.黑猩猩在三方最后通牒博弈中表现出竞争利他行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53973-6.
8
The behavioral effects of cooperative and competitive board games in preschoolers.幼儿合作和竞争棋盘游戏的行为影响。
Scand J Psychol. 2021 Jun;62(3):355-364. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12708. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
9
Young children's reputational strategies in a peer group context.幼儿在同伴群体情境中的名誉策略。
Dev Psychol. 2019 Feb;55(2):329-336. doi: 10.1037/dev0000639. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
10
Nice guys finish first: the competitive altruism hypothesis.好人先赢:竞争性利他主义假说。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2006 Oct;32(10):1402-13. doi: 10.1177/0146167206291006.

引用本文的文献

1
Chimpanzees engage in competitive altruism in a triadic ultimatum game.黑猩猩在三方最后通牒博弈中表现出竞争利他行为。
Sci Rep. 2024 Feb 9;14(1):3393. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53973-6.
2
No good deed goes unpunished: the social costs of prosocial behaviour.善有恶报:亲社会行为的社会成本。
Evol Hum Sci. 2021 Jul 21;3:e40. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2021.35. eCollection 2021.
3
Evidence for a developmental shift in the motivation underlying helping in early childhood.有证据表明,儿童早期帮助行为的动机在发展过程中发生了转变。
Dev Sci. 2023 Jan;26(1):e13253. doi: 10.1111/desc.13253. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
4
The Emergence of Lying for Reputational Concerns in 5-Year-Olds.5岁儿童出于声誉考虑而说谎的现象初现。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 22;12:700695. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.700695. eCollection 2021.
5
The language of cooperation: reputation and honest signalling.合作的语言:声誉与诚实信号。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200286. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0286. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Networks of reliable reputations and cooperation: a review.可靠声誉和合作网络:综述。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200297. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0297. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
7
Evaluating mechanisms that could support credible reputations and cooperation: cross-checking and social bonding.评估能够支持可信声誉和合作的机制:交叉检查和社会联系。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200302. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0302. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
8
The benefits of being seen to help others: indirect reciprocity and reputation-based partner choice.被视为帮助他人的好处:间接互惠和基于声誉的伴侣选择。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2021 Nov 22;376(1838):20200290. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2020.0290. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
9
Scarce and directly beneficial reputations support cooperation.稀缺且直接有益的声誉有助于合作。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jul 13;10(1):11486. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68123-x.