• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

曲伏前列素/噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂与0.004%曲伏前列素和0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶制剂联合使用的疗效比较。

Efficacy of the travoprost/timolol fixed combination versus the concomitant use of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.1% gel formulation.

作者信息

Kozobolis Vassilios, Konstantinidis Aristeidis, Sideroudi Haris, Teus Miguel

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece,

Eye Institute of Thrace (EIT), Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece,

出版信息

Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 23;12:2393-2398. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172822. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S172822
PMID:30538422
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6260185/
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the hypotensive effect of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination (TTFC) to the concomitant use of travoprost and timolol 0.1% gel formulation (Trav + Geltim).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-three patients (62 eyes) were enrolled and divided into two groups. Patients in group 1 (31 eyes) received the TTFC and patients in group 2 (31 eyes) received the concomitant treatment with Trav + Geltim. Patients on previous antiglaucoma treatment discontinued their drops for 2-4 weeks before starting their new treatment (TTFC or Trav + Geltim). The drops were instilled in the evening in group 1 and in group 2, the prostaglandin was installed in the evening, and timolol in the morning. IOP was measured at 1 and 3 months after the initiation of treatment at four time points during the day (09:00, 12:00, 15:00, and 18:00).

RESULTS

Both groups showed significant IOP reduction from baseline at all time points at 1 and 3 months. When the two groups were compared, group 2 showed slightly better hypotensive effect that reached statistical significance only at the 18:00 time point at both 1 and 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Both the TTFC and the concomitant use of the travoprost/timolol gel showed similar hypotensive effect with the latter being slightly more potent in reducing the IOP.

摘要

目的

比较0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂(TTFC)与曲伏前列素和0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶制剂联合使用(曲伏前列素+噻吗洛尔凝胶)的降压效果。

材料与方法

纳入33例患者(62只眼)并分为两组。第1组(31只眼)患者接受TTFC治疗,第2组(31只眼)患者接受曲伏前列素+噻吗洛尔凝胶联合治疗。之前接受抗青光眼治疗的患者在开始新治疗(TTFC或曲伏前列素+噻吗洛尔凝胶)前停用滴眼液2 - 4周。第1组在晚上滴注滴眼液,第2组晚上滴注前列腺素,早上滴注噻吗洛尔。在治疗开始后1个月和3个月的白天4个时间点(09:00、12:00、15:00和18:00)测量眼压。

结果

两组在1个月和3个月的所有时间点眼压均较基线显著降低。两组比较时,第2组降压效果略好,仅在1个月和3个月的18:00时间点达到统计学意义。

结论

TTFC和曲伏前列素/噻吗洛尔凝胶联合使用均显示出相似的降压效果,后者在降低眼压方面略强。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of the travoprost/timolol fixed combination versus the concomitant use of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.1% gel formulation.曲伏前列素/噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂与0.004%曲伏前列素和0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶制剂联合使用的疗效比较。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 23;12:2393-2398. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S172822. eCollection 2018.
2
Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.青光眼或高眼压症患者使用固定复方制剂与非固定复方制剂的0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
A three-month, multicenter, double-masked study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution compared to travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution and timolol 0.5% dosed concomitantly in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项为期三个月的多中心双盲研究,旨在比较0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液与0.004%曲伏前列素滴眼液和0.5%噻吗洛尔滴眼液同时给药对开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者的安全性和有效性。
J Glaucoma. 2005 Oct;14(5):392-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ijg.0000176935.08392.14.
4
A 1-year study to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% to once-daily latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.一项为期1年的研究,比较0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔每日一次与0.005%拉坦前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔每日一次在开角型青光眼或高眼压症患者中的疗效和安全性。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2007 Mar-Apr;17(2):183-90. doi: 10.1177/112067210701700206.
5
Pooled results of two randomized clinical trials comparing the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% in fixed combination versus concomitant travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5%.两项随机临床试验的汇总结果,比较了0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔固定复方与0.004%曲伏前列素和0.5%噻吗洛尔联合使用的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2007 Sep;1(3):317-22.
6
Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination in patients transitioning from fixed or unfixed bimatoprost 0.03%/timolol 0.5%.曲伏前列素 0.004%/噻吗洛尔 0.5% 固定联合制剂在从固定或不固定浓度的贝美前列素 0.03%/噻吗洛尔 0.5% 转换过来的患者中的应用。
Adv Ther. 2011 Aug;28(8):661-70. doi: 10.1007/s12325-011-0043-z. Epub 2011 Jul 15.
7
24-hour efficacy of travoprost/timolol BAK-free versus latanoprost/timolol fixed combinations in patients insufficiently controlled with latanoprost.曲伏前列素/无苯扎氯铵的噻吗洛尔与拉坦前列素/噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂对拉坦前列素治疗控制不佳患者的24小时疗效比较
Adv Ther. 2014 Jun;31(6):592-603. doi: 10.1007/s12325-014-0125-9. Epub 2014 Jun 12.
8
Ocular hypotensive effect and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol maleate 0.5% fixed combination after change of treatment regimen from β-blockers and prostaglandin analogs.在从β受体阻滞剂和前列腺素类似物转换治疗方案后,0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%马来酸噻吗洛尔固定组合的降眼压效果及安全性
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:231-5. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S29062. Epub 2012 Feb 10.
9
Bimatoprost/timolol versus travoprost/timolol fixed combinations in an Egyptian population: a hospital-based prospective randomized study.
J Glaucoma. 2014 Oct-Nov;23(8):561-6. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182867be3.
10
The efficacy and safety of bimatoprost/timolol maleate, latanoprost/timolol maleate, and travoprost/timolol maleate fixed combinations on 24-h IOP.比马前列素/马来酸噻吗洛尔、拉坦前列素/马来酸噻吗洛尔和曲伏前列素/马来酸噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂对24小时眼压的疗效和安全性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;38(4):1425-1431. doi: 10.1007/s10792-017-0601-8. Epub 2017 Jun 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Efficacy and Ocular Surface Disease Index Score between Bimatoprost, Latanoprost, Travoprost, and Tafluprost in Glaucoma Patients.比马前列素、拉坦前列素、曲伏前列素和他氟前列素在青光眼患者中的疗效及眼表疾病指数评分比较
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 7;2018:1319628. doi: 10.1155/2018/1319628. eCollection 2018.
2
Adherence to Fixed-Combination Versus Unfixed Travoprost 0.004%/Timolol 0.5% for Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension: A Randomized Trial.青光眼或高眼压症患者使用固定复方制剂与非固定复方制剂的0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔的疗效比较:一项随机试验
Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr;176:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.12.002. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
3
Fixed-combination intraocular pressure-lowering therapy for glaucoma and ocular hypertension: advantages in clinical practice.
用于青光眼和高眼压症的固定复方降眼压疗法:临床实践中的优势
Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2014 Aug;15(12):1737-47. doi: 10.1517/14656566.2014.936850. Epub 2014 Jul 5.
4
Efficacy of Timolol 0.1% Gel and a Prostaglandin Analog in an Unfixed Combination Compared to the Corresponding Fixed Combinations.0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶与前列腺素类似物非固定组合相较于相应固定组合的疗效。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2013 Sep-Oct;23(5):683-689. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5000292.
5
Glaucoma therapy and ocular surface disease: current literature and recommendations.青光眼治疗与眼表面疾病:当前文献与建议。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2013 Mar;24(2):136-43. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32835c8aba.
6
Safety and efficacy of unpreserved timolol 0.1% gel in patients controlled by preserved latanoprost with signs of ocular intolerance.未保存的0.1%噻吗洛尔凝胶在由保存的拉坦前列素控制且有眼部不耐受迹象的患者中的安全性和有效性。
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2013 Apr;36(4):316-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2012.04.015. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
7
A comparison of 0.1% timolol eye gel and 0.5% timolol eye drop in patients with chronic angle-closure glaucoma.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Apr;95 Suppl 4:S116-22.
8
Efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination as transition therapy in patients previously on prostaglandin analog monotherapy.0.004%曲伏前列素/0.5%噻吗洛尔固定复方制剂作为曾接受前列腺素类似物单药治疗患者的转换疗法的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ophthalmol. 2012;6:699-706. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S30717. Epub 2012 May 7.
9
Considerations in glaucoma therapy: fixed combinations versus their component medications.青光眼治疗的考量因素:固定复方制剂与其单一成分药物的对比
Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Feb 2;4:1-9.
10
Prevalence of ocular surface disease in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者眼表疾病的患病率。
J Glaucoma. 2008 Aug;17(5):350-5. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e31815c5f4f.