• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Learning best-practices in journalology: course description and attendee insights into the inaugural EQUATOR Canada Publication School.学习期刊学的最佳实践:课程描述及参会者对加拿大EQUATOR首发出版学校的见解
BMC Proc. 2018 Aug 23;12(Suppl 10):18. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0155-4. eCollection 2018.
2
Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol).系统评价培训计划在学术出版物写作、期刊编辑和稿件同行评审方面的有效性(方案)。
Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 17;2:41. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-2-41.
3
The inaugural Qatar Critical Care Conference with its Qatar Medical Journal Special Issue - An important milestone.首届卡塔尔重症监护会议及其《卡塔尔医学杂志》特刊——一个重要的里程碑。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):1. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.1. eCollection 2019.
4
Exploring conceptual and theoretical frameworks for nurse practitioner education: a scoping review protocol.探索执业护士教育的概念和理论框架:一项范围综述方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):146-55. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2150.
5
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
6
Integrity of the editing and publishing process is the basis for improving an academic journal's Impact Factor.编辑和出版过程的完整性是提高学术期刊影响因子的基础。
World J Gastroenterol. 2022 Nov 21;28(43):6168-6202. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i43.6168.
7
Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.发表科学论文应采用的规则。
Ann Ital Chir. 2016;87:1-3.
8
Open Centres for Journalology in Universities and Institutions.大学和机构中的期刊学开放中心。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Aug;25(4):1259-1260. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0047-z. Epub 2018 Mar 19.
9
Journal publication ethics and implications for life science researchers: a COPE perspective.期刊出版伦理及其对生命科学研究人员的影响:COPE视角
Emerg Top Life Sci. 2018 Dec 21;2(6):763-767. doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180164.
10
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review highlights a knowledge gap regarding the effectiveness of health-related training programs in journalology.一项系统评价强调了健康相关培训计划在期刊学方面有效性的知识空白。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):257-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.024. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
2
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.提高价值,减少浪费:解决研究的不可获取性问题。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
3
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
4
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane review.CONSORT 声明的使用是否会影响医学期刊发表的随机对照试验报告的完整性?一项 Cochrane 综述。
Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 29;1:60. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-1-60.
5
Publication guidelines need widespread adoption.出版指南需要广泛采用。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2012 Mar;65(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.008. Epub 2011 Oct 15.
6
Disseminating research findings: what should researchers do? A systematic scoping review of conceptual frameworks.传播研究成果:研究人员应该怎么做?概念框架的系统范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2010 Nov 22;5:91. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-91.
7
So many questions, so few answers. Interview by Les Olson.问题多多,答案寥寥。采访 Les Olson。
Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Aug 1;88(8):568-9. doi: 10.2471/BLT.10.030810.
8
A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research.健康研究报告规范目录。
Eur J Clin Invest. 2010 Jan;40(1):35-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02234.x.
9
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告中的可避免浪费。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
10
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.《流行病学观察性研究报告强化(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南
J Clin Epidemiol. 2008 Apr;61(4):344-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.11.008.

学习期刊学的最佳实践:课程描述及参会者对加拿大EQUATOR首发出版学校的见解

Learning best-practices in journalology: course description and attendee insights into the inaugural EQUATOR Canada Publication School.

作者信息

Galica Jacqueline, Chee-A-Tow Alyssandra, Gupta Shikha, Jaiswal Atul, Monsour Andrea, Tricco Andrea C, Cobey Kelly D, Butcher Nancy J

机构信息

1School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

2Child Health Evaluative Sciences, The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute, Toronto, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Proc. 2018 Aug 23;12(Suppl 10):18. doi: 10.1186/s12919-018-0155-4. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.1186/s12919-018-0155-4
PMID:30540288
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6117632/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dissemination of research results is a key component of the research continuum and is commonly achieved through publication in peer-reviewed academic journals. However, issues of poor quality reporting in the research literature are well documented. A lack of formal training in journalology (i.e., publication science) may contribute to this problem. To help address this gap in training, the Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency Of health Research (EQUATOR) Canada Publication School was developed and facilitated by internationally-renowned faculty to train researchers and clinicians in reporting and publication best practices. This article describes the structure of the inaugural course and provides an overview of attendee evaluations and perspectives.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS

Attendees perceived the content of this two-day intensive course as highly informative. They noted that the course helped them learn skills that were relevant to academic publishing (e.g., using reporting guidelines in all phases of the research process; using scholarly metrics beyond the journal impact factor; open-access publication models; and engaging patients in the research process). The course provided an opportunity for researchers to share their challenges faced during the publication process and to learn skills for improving reproducibility, completeness, transparency, and dissemination of research results. There was some suggestion that this type of course should be offered and integrated into formal training and course curricula.

IMPLICATIONS

In light of the importance of academic publishing in the scientific process, there is a need to train and prepare researchers with skills in Journalology. The EQUATOR Canada Publication School provides an example of a successful program that addressed the needs of researchers across career trajectories and provided them with resources to be successful in the publication process. This approach can be used, modified, and/or adapted by curriculum developers interested in designing similar programs, and could be incorporated into academic and clinical research training programs.

摘要

背景与目的

研究成果的传播是研究连续过程的关键组成部分,通常通过在同行评审学术期刊上发表来实现。然而,研究文献中质量报告不佳的问题有充分记录。在期刊学(即出版科学)方面缺乏正规培训可能导致了这一问题。为了帮助弥补这一培训差距,由国际知名教员开发并推动了加拿大提高健康研究质量与透明度(EQUATOR)出版学院,以培训研究人员和临床医生掌握报告和出版的最佳实践。本文描述了首届课程的结构,并概述了学员的评价和观点。

重点亮点

学员们认为这为期两天的强化课程内容信息量极大。他们指出,该课程帮助他们学习了与学术出版相关的技能(例如,在研究过程的各个阶段使用报告指南;使用期刊影响因子之外的学术指标;开放获取出版模式;以及让患者参与研究过程)。该课程为研究人员提供了一个机会,让他们分享在出版过程中面临的挑战,并学习提高研究结果的可重复性、完整性、透明度和传播的技能。有人建议应提供此类课程并将其纳入正规培训和课程设置中。

启示

鉴于学术出版在科学过程中的重要性,有必要培训研究人员并使其具备期刊学技能。加拿大EQUATOR出版学院提供了一个成功项目的范例,该项目满足了不同职业阶段研究人员的需求,并为他们提供了在出版过程中取得成功的资源。对设计类似项目感兴趣的课程开发者可以采用、修改和/或调整这种方法,并将其纳入学术和临床研究培训项目中。