Zijlmans Eva A O, Tijmstra Jesper, van der Ark L Andries, Sijtsma Klaas
Tilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Educ Psychol Meas. 2018 Dec;78(6):998-1020. doi: 10.1177/0013164417728358. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
Reliability is usually estimated for a total score, but it can also be estimated for item scores. Item-score reliability can be useful to assess the repeatability of an individual item score in a group. Three methods to estimate item-score reliability are discussed, known as method MS, method , and method CA. The item-score reliability methods are compared with four well-known and widely accepted item indices, which are the item-rest correlation, the item-factor loading, the item scalability, and the item discrimination. Realistic values for item-score reliability in empirical-data sets are monitored to obtain an impression of the values to be expected in other empirical-data sets. The relation between the three item-score reliability methods and the four well-known item indices are investigated. Tentatively, a minimum value for the item-score reliability methods to be used in item analysis is recommended.
信度通常是针对总分进行估计,但也可以针对项目得分进行估计。项目得分信度对于评估一组中单个项目得分的可重复性很有用。讨论了三种估计项目得分信度的方法,即方法MS、方法 和方法CA。将项目得分信度方法与四个著名且被广泛接受的项目指标进行比较,这四个指标是项目与其余部分的相关性、项目因子载荷、项目可扩展性和项目区分度。监测实证数据集中项目得分信度的实际值,以了解其他实证数据集中预期的值。研究了三种项目得分信度方法与四个著名项目指标之间的关系。初步建议了项目分析中使用的项目得分信度方法的最小值。