Suppr超能文献

肥胖症手术中即刻术后上消化道造影检查的应用。

Utility of Immediate Postoperative Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study in Bariatric Surgery.

机构信息

Division of General Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Rd, Jacksonville, FL, 32224, USA.

出版信息

Obes Surg. 2019 Apr;29(4):1130-1133. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-03639-w.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Routine use of postoperative upper gastrointestinal (UGI) contrast studies after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is controversial. We sought to determine the usefulness of routine UGI contrast studies during postoperative day (POD) 1 in patients who underwent bariatric surgery.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of patients who underwent SG or RYGB between January 1, 2016, and October 31, 2017. Demographics, surgical data, and immediate surgical adverse effects were collected. We compared patients who underwent routine UGI contrast studies on POD 1 versus patients who did not.

RESULTS

A total of 284 patients were analyzed; 197 (69.4%) patients underwent RYGB, while 87 (30.6%) underwent SG. Routine UGI contrast study was performed in 96 (48.7%) patients in the RYGB group versus 31 (35.6%) in the SG group. The overall adverse effect rate was 2 (0.7%); postoperative UGI contrast study was negative in both cases. Mean (SD) length of stay (LOS) for patients who underwent UGI contrast study versus those who did not was similar in the RYGB group (1.8 [1.6] days vs 1.8 [0.9] days, respectively) and the SG group (2 [1.18] days vs 1.9 [0.9] days). The average cost of a postoperative UGI contrast study was $600, resulting in an additional overall cost of $76,800.

CONCLUSION

Use of routine UGI contrast studies after bariatric procedures does not appear to add clinical value for the detection of leaks. Furthermore, systematic use of postoperative UGI contrast studies neither seem to reduce LOS, nor appear to increase procedure costs.

摘要

简介

袖状胃切除术(SG)和 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)后常规使用术后上消化道(UGI)对比研究存在争议。我们旨在确定在接受减重手术的患者中,术后第 1 天常规进行 UGI 对比研究的有用性。

方法

我们对 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 10 月 31 日期间接受 SG 或 RYGB 的患者进行了回顾性研究。收集了人口统计学、手术数据和即时手术不良影响。我们比较了在术后第 1 天接受常规 UGI 对比研究的患者与未接受的患者。

结果

共分析了 284 例患者;197 例(69.4%)患者接受了 RYGB,87 例(30.6%)接受了 SG。RYGB 组中有 96 例(48.7%)患者进行了常规 UGI 对比研究,SG 组中有 31 例(35.6%)。整体不良影响发生率为 2 例(0.7%);两种情况下术后 UGI 对比研究均为阴性。RYGB 组中接受 UGI 对比研究的患者与未接受的患者的平均住院时间(LOS)相似(分别为 1.8[1.6]天和 1.8[0.9]天),SG 组也相似(2[1.18]天和 1.9[0.9]天)。术后 UGI 对比研究的平均费用为 600 美元,导致总费用额外增加 76800 美元。

结论

在减重手术之后使用常规 UGI 对比研究似乎并不能增加对漏诊的临床价值。此外,系统使用术后 UGI 对比研究既不能降低 LOS,也不能增加手术成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验