Moullin Joanna C, Moore Laurie A, Novins Douglas K, Aarons Gregory A
Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth, WA, 6845, Australia.
Child and Adolescent Research Centre, San Diego, USA.
J Behav Health Serv Res. 2019 Jul;46(3):509-520. doi: 10.1007/s11414-018-9643-6.
The objective of this paper was to compare attitudes towards evidence-based practice (EBP) of substance use disorder treatment (SUDT) center employees' serving American Indian and Alaskan Native (AIAN) populations to those serving non-AIAN populations. Survey data on the openness and divergence subscales of the Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS) were collected and analyzed. Independent samples T tests were performed to compare the two samples. For all comparisons, except the divergence subscale between counselors, the SUDT employees serving AIANs had significantly lower mean openness scores and higher mean divergence scores than those serving non-AIANs. This study suggests that employees of SUDT centers serving AIAN population hold less positive attitudes towards the adoption and use of EBP than non-AIAN.
本文的目的是比较物质使用障碍治疗(SUDT)中心为美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)群体服务的员工与为非AIAN群体服务的员工对循证实践(EBP)的态度。收集并分析了基于循证实践态度量表(EBPAS)的开放性和分歧性子量表的调查数据。进行独立样本T检验以比较这两个样本。除了咨询师之间的分歧性子量表外,在所有比较中,为AIAN群体服务的SUDT员工的平均开放性得分显著低于为非AIAN群体服务的员工,平均分歧得分则更高。这项研究表明,为AIAN群体服务的SUDT中心员工对采用和使用EBP的态度不如非AIAN群体积极。