School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
New Zealand National Eye Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 13;13(12):e0209004. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209004. eCollection 2018.
Today's students have increased expectations for flexible learning options and evidence-based practice resources to be available to support curricular activities. We investigated: (i) the suitability of a static website for teaching ocular anatomy and physiology and an interactive version of the website with quiz and self-assessment activities and (ii) the usefulness of a blended online and in-lab environment to teach in Optometry. We administered a survey to compare responses of optometry students who had access to the interactive website, with those from students from a previous year who used the static version. We examined learning preferences of students in a focus group. Students were positive about the value of the website for their learning and the clarity of the website content. Nevertheless, objective comparison of pass rates for students using the static and interactive websites did not show significant changes. The majority of students commenting on the static website felt they did not get sufficient feedback via the website (67%) compared with only 22% from students who used self-assessments in the interactive website. Interestingly, users of the static website commented that it was perceived as just another resource while users of the interactive website commented on the usefulness of the material to review knowledge before laboratories. In the focus group, students reported they preferred a blended learning over the website alone even by students using the interactive website as they felt the need to revise content with the educator before the test. We conclude that there is acceptance of online learning methods due to the technologically 'savvy' environment of students in the first year of the Optometry programme but there is still dependence on the educator as the main administrator of their learning.
如今的学生对灵活的学习选择和基于证据的实践资源的期望越来越高,这些资源需要支持课程活动。我们调查了:(i)静态网站在教授眼科解剖学和生理学方面的适用性,以及具有测验和自我评估活动的交互式网站,以及(ii)混合在线和实验室环境在验光教学中的有用性。我们进行了一项调查,以比较使用交互式网站的验光学生的反应与前一年使用静态版本的学生的反应。我们在焦点小组中研究了学生的学习偏好。学生对网站对他们学习的价值和网站内容的清晰度表示肯定。尽管如此,对使用静态和交互式网站的学生的及格率进行客观比较并没有显示出显著变化。与使用交互式网站进行自我评估的学生相比,评论静态网站的大多数学生认为他们没有通过网站获得足够的反馈(67%)。有趣的是,使用静态网站的用户认为它只是另一种资源,而使用交互式网站的用户则认为该材料在实验室前复习知识很有用。在焦点小组中,学生报告说,即使是使用交互式网站的学生也更喜欢混合学习而不是仅使用网站,因为他们觉得在考试前需要与教育者一起复习内容。我们得出的结论是,由于验光课程第一年的学生对技术“精通”的环境,他们接受了在线学习方法,但仍然依赖教育者作为他们学习的主要管理者。