Center for Hand Therapy, Handtherapie Nederland, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinic, Hilversum, The Netherlands.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Jun;100(6):1050-1060. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.11.010. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
To compare the effect of exercises and orthotics with orthotics alone on pain and hand function in patients with first carpometacarpal joint (CMC-1) osteoarthritis (OA) and to predict outcomes on pain and hand function of exercises and orthotics.
Prospective cohort study with propensity score matching.
Data collection took place in 13 outpatient clinics for hand surgery and hand therapy in The Netherlands.
A consecutive, population-based sample of patients with CMC-1 OA (N=173) was included in this study, of which 84 were matched on baseline demographics and baseline primary outcomes.
Exercises and orthotics versus orthotics alone.
Primary outcomes included pain and hand function at 3 months, measured using visual analog scale (VAS, 0-100) and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ, 0-100).
A larger decrease in VAS pain at rest (11.1 points difference; 95% confidence interval, 1.9-20.3; P=.002) and during physical load (22.7 points difference; 95% confidence interval, 13.6-31.0; P<.001) was found in the exercise + orthotic group compared to the orthotic group. In addition, larger improvement was found for the MHQ subscales pain, work performance, aesthetics, and satisfaction in the exercise + orthotic group. No differences were found on other outcomes. Baseline scores of metacarpophalangeal flexion, presence of scaphotrapeziotrapezoid OA, VAS pain at rest, heavy physical labor, and MHQ total predicted primary outcomes for the total exercise + orthotic group (N=131).
Non-surgical treatment of patients with CMC-1 OA should include exercises, since there is a relatively large treatment effect compared to using an orthosis alone. Future research should study exercises and predictors in a more standardized setting to confirm this finding.
比较运动疗法联合矫形器与单纯矫形器治疗第一腕掌关节(CMC-1)骨关节炎(OA)的疗效,预测运动疗法联合矫形器治疗对疼痛和手部功能的影响。
前瞻性队列研究,采用倾向评分匹配。
数据采集在荷兰 13 家手外科和手治疗门诊进行。
本研究纳入了连续的、基于人群的 CMC-1 OA 患者样本(N=173),其中 84 名患者在基线人口统计学和基线主要结局方面进行了匹配。
运动疗法联合矫形器与单纯矫形器。
主要结局包括 3 个月时的疼痛和手部功能,采用视觉模拟量表(VAS,0-100)和密歇根手功能问卷(MHQ,0-100)进行评估。
与矫形器组相比,运动疗法联合矫形器组在静息时(11.1 分差异;95%置信区间,1.9-20.3;P=.002)和体力活动时(22.7 分差异;95%置信区间,13.6-31.0;P<.001)的 VAS 疼痛评分有更大的下降。此外,运动疗法联合矫形器组在 MHQ 子量表疼痛、工作表现、美学和满意度方面也有更大的改善。其他结局无差异。掌指关节屈曲度、舟月骨间关节炎、静息时 VAS 疼痛、重体力劳动和 MHQ 总分等基线评分可预测总运动疗法联合矫形器组(N=131)的主要结局。
对于 CMC-1 OA 患者,非手术治疗应包括运动疗法,因为与单纯使用矫形器相比,其治疗效果相对较大。未来的研究应在更标准化的环境中研究运动疗法和预测因素,以证实这一发现。