Suppr超能文献

老年血液透析患者血管通路手术结局的性别差异。

Gender Disparities in Vascular Access Surgical Outcomes in Elderly Hemodialysis Patients.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at, Birmingham, Alabama, USA,

Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama, USA,

出版信息

Am J Nephrol. 2019;49(1):11-19. doi: 10.1159/000495261. Epub 2018 Dec 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite national vascular access guidelines promoting the use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) over arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) for dialysis, AVF use is substantially lower in females. We assessed clinically relevant AVF and AVG surgical outcomes in elderly male and female patients initiating hemodialysis with a central venous catheter (CVC).

METHODS

Using the United States Renal Data System standard analytic files linked with Medicare claims, we assessed incident hemodialysis patients in the United States, 9,458 elderly patients (≥67 years; 4,927 males and 4,531 females) initiating hemodialysis from July 2010 to June 2011 with a catheter and had an AVF or AVG placed within 6 months. We evaluated vascular access placement, successful use for dialysis, assisted use (requiring an intervention before successful use), abandonment after successful use, and rate of interventions after successful use.

RESULTS

Females were less likely than males to receive an AVF (adjusted likelihood 0.57, 95% CI 0.52-0.63). Among patients receiving an AVF, females had higher adjusted likelihoods of unsuccessful AVF use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% CI 1.36-1.56), assisted AVF use (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.17-1.54), and AVF abandonment (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.10-1.50), but similar relative rate of AVF interventions after successful use (relative risk [RR] 1.01, 95% CI 0.94-1.08). Among patients receiving an AVG, females had a lower likelihood of unsuccessful AVG use (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.73-0.94), similar rates of assisted AVG use (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.78-1.40) and AVG abandonment, and greater relative rate of interventions after successful AVG use (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.01-1.33).

CONCLUSIONS

While AVFs should be considered the preferred vascular access in most circumstances, clinical AVF surgical outcomes are uniformly worse in females. Clinicians should also consider AVGs as a viable alternative in elderly female patients initiating hemodialysis with a CVC to avoid extended CVC dependence.

摘要

背景

尽管国家血管通路指南提倡使用动静脉瘘(AVF)而非动静脉移植物(AVG)进行透析,但女性使用 AVF 的比例仍然明显较低。我们评估了在使用中心静脉导管(CVC)开始血液透析的老年男性和女性患者中,临床相关的 AVF 和 AVG 手术结局。

方法

使用美国肾脏数据系统标准分析文件与医疗保险索赔数据进行关联,我们评估了 2010 年 7 月至 2011 年 6 月期间美国首次接受血液透析的患者,共 9458 名老年患者(≥67 岁;4927 名男性和 4531 名女性),他们使用 CVC 开始血液透析,并在 6 个月内进行了 AVF 或 AVG 置管。我们评估了血管通路的置管、用于透析的成功使用、辅助使用(在成功使用之前需要进行干预)、成功使用后的废弃以及成功使用后的干预率。

结果

女性获得 AVF 的可能性低于男性(调整后的可能性为 0.57,95%CI 0.52-0.63)。在接受 AVF 的患者中,女性 AVF 使用不成功的调整后可能性更高(风险比[HR]1.46,95%CI 1.36-1.56)、辅助 AVF 使用(OR 1.34,95%CI 1.17-1.54)和 AVF 废弃(HR 1.28,95%CI 1.10-1.50)的可能性更高,但成功使用后的 AVF 干预相对率相似(相对风险[RR]1.01,95%CI 0.94-1.08)。在接受 AVG 的患者中,女性 AVG 使用不成功的可能性较低(HR 0.83,95%CI 0.73-0.94),辅助 AVG 使用(OR 1.05,95%CI 0.78-1.40)和 AVG 废弃的可能性相似,成功使用后的干预相对率更高(RR 1.16,95%CI 1.01-1.33)。

结论

虽然在大多数情况下,AVF 应该被视为首选的血管通路,但女性的临床 AVF 手术结局普遍较差。临床医生在为开始使用 CVC 进行血液透析的老年女性患者选择血管通路时,也应考虑将 AVG 作为一种可行的替代方案,以避免长期依赖 CVC。

相似文献

7
Vascular access for hemodialysis in the elderly.老年患者血液透析的血管通路。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):517-525.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.219.
10

引用本文的文献

6
Predictors of Arteriovenous Fistula Failure: A Analysis of the FAVOURED Study.动静脉瘘失败的预测因素:FAVOURED 研究分析。
Kidney360. 2020 Sep 14;1(11):1259-1269. doi: 10.34067/KID.0002732020. eCollection 2020 Nov 25.
9
Perspectives in Individualizing Solutions for Dialysis Access.透析通路个体化解决方案的思考。
Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2020 May;27(3):183-190. doi: 10.1053/j.ackd.2020.03.004.

本文引用的文献

3

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验