McLellan D L, Selwyn M, Cooper I S
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1978 Feb;41(2):150-60. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.41.2.150.
A double-blind study of the short-term (12--48 hours) effects of cerebellar stimulation was performed on 11 selected patients with spasticity. Six of patients had a good clinical long-term response to chronic stimulation, four had a moderate response, and one had no response. Each patient received stimulation for two periods of 24 hours and was off stimulation for two periods of 24 hours. The periods were randomised over four consecutive days. Neither the patients nor the observer could distinguish between the days on stimulation and the days off stimulation. Simple tests of function of the upper limbs during stimulation, measurements of H responses, tonic vibration responses, vibration-induced suppression of H responses, stretch responses, and co-contraction, showed no differences between the four days. These results are contrasted with acute physiological changes seen in some patients during stimulation and also with the slow progressive improvement in clinical function that characterises the successful clinical response. It is suggested that lack of either acute or short-term changes in response to cerebellar stimulation does not predict the clinical outcome. If the strength of stimulation is changed, at least three days and preferably 10 days should be allowed for the effects to appear. The mechanisms responsible for the alleviation of spasticity are likely to be more complex than those mediating acute and reversible changes in reflex activity.
对11例选定的痉挛患者进行了一项关于小脑刺激短期(12 - 48小时)效果的双盲研究。其中6例患者对慢性刺激有良好的临床长期反应,4例有中度反应,1例无反应。每位患者接受两个24小时的刺激期,并休息两个24小时的刺激期。这些时期在连续四天内随机安排。患者和观察者均无法区分刺激日和非刺激日。在刺激期间对上肢功能进行的简单测试、H反射、强直性振动反射、振动诱发的H反射抑制、牵张反射和共同收缩的测量结果显示,这四天之间没有差异。这些结果与一些患者在刺激期间出现的急性生理变化形成对比,也与成功临床反应所特有的临床功能缓慢渐进改善形成对比。研究表明,对小脑刺激缺乏急性或短期变化并不能预测临床结果。如果改变刺激强度,至少应等待三天,最好等待十天,以便观察到效果。缓解痉挛的机制可能比介导反射活动急性和可逆变化的机制更为复杂。