Bouallçgue Fayçal Ben, Nganoa Catherine, Vigne Jonathan, Agostini Denis, Manrique Alain
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Montpellier University Hospital, Caen, France.
PhyMedExp, INSERM - CNRS, Montpellier University, Montpellier, Caen, France.
J Clin Imaging Sci. 2018 Nov 15;8:51. doi: 10.4103/jcis.JCIS_71_17. eCollection 2018.
We evaluated the relative performances of dipyridamole (Dip) and regadenoson (Reg) in a cohort of patients referred for coronary artery disease diagnosis or follow-up using myocardial perfusion imaging.
We retrospectively included 515 consecutive patients referred for Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion single-photon emission computerized tomography (SPECT) on a cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) camera after pharmacologic stress. About three quarters ( = 391, 76%) received Dip. Reg was administrated to patients with chronical respiratory disease or with body mass index (BMI) over 38 kg/m ( = 124, 24%). Patients with an abnormal stress scan (92%) underwent a rest imaging on the same day. Qualitative interpretation of perfusion images was achieved using QPS software, and the ischemic area was assessed using the 17-segment model. In patients undergoing a stress-rest protocol, perfusion polar plots were postprocessed using automated in-house software to quantify the extension, intensity, and location of the reversible perfusion defect. Statistical comparison between groups was performed using univariate and multivariate analysis.
Qualitative analysis concluded to myocardial ischemia in 70% of the patients (69% in the Dip group, 76% in the Reg group, = ns). In those patients, the number of involved segments (Dip 2.5 ± 1.6, Reg 2.7 ± 1.6, = ns) and the proportion of patients with an ischemic area larger than two segments (Dip 30%, Reg 37%, = ns) were comparable. Automated quantification of the reversible perfusion defect demonstrated similar defect extension, intensity, and severity in the two groups. Defect location was identical at the myocardial segment and vascular territory scales.
Reg and Dip showed equal performances for ischemic burden characterization using myocardial CZT SPECT.
我们在一组因冠心病诊断或随访而接受心肌灌注成像的患者中评估了双嘧达莫(Dip)和瑞加诺生(Reg)的相对性能。
我们回顾性纳入了515例连续接受药理学负荷后在碲化镉锌(CZT)相机上进行锝-司他比心肌灌注单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)的患者。约四分之三(n = 391,76%)接受了双嘧达莫。瑞加诺生用于患有慢性呼吸系统疾病或体重指数(BMI)超过38 kg/m²的患者(n = 124,24%)。负荷扫描异常的患者(92%)在同一天进行静息成像。使用QPS软件对灌注图像进行定性解读,并使用17节段模型评估缺血区域。在接受负荷-静息方案的患者中,使用内部自动化软件对灌注极坐标图进行后处理,以量化可逆灌注缺损的范围、强度和位置。使用单因素和多因素分析进行组间统计比较。
定性分析得出70%的患者存在心肌缺血(双嘧达莫组为69%,瑞加诺生组为76%,P = 无显著性差异)。在这些患者中,受累节段数(双嘧达莫组2.5±1.6,瑞加诺生组2.7±1.6,P = 无显著性差异)以及缺血区域大于两个节段的患者比例(双嘧达莫组30%,瑞加诺生组37%,P = 无显著性差异)具有可比性。可逆灌注缺损的自动量化显示两组的缺损范围、强度和严重程度相似。在心肌节段和血管区域尺度上,缺损位置相同。
瑞加诺生和双嘧达莫在使用心肌CZT SPECT表征缺血负荷方面表现相当。