• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估在并发和单项操作安排下不同努力值和强化值。

Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.

机构信息

University of Maryland, Baltimore County and Kennedy Krieger Institute.

University of Maryland, Baltimore County.

出版信息

J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 May;52(2):516-533. doi: 10.1002/jaba.533. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1002/jaba.533
PMID:30548587
Abstract

If particular parameters (e.g., reinforcer quality) are found to be preferred in a concurrent-operant arrangement, then these should be incorporated into interventions for maintaining skills in individuals with intellectual disabilities. However, because results from a concurrent-operant arrangement may not predict those of a single-operant assessment, interventions with less preferred parameters may also be effective. The purpose of this study was to determine if preference for a particular parameter, determined via concurrent-operant arrangements, predicted responding when two values of highly and less preferred parameters were manipulated in a single-operant arrangement. Participants allocated responding to one parameter over another during concurrent-operant assessments, indicating that certain parameters were highly preferred. However, contingent presentation of two values of less preferred parameters increased compliance to similar levels achieved with two highly preferred parameters in a single-operant arrangement. These findings suggest that clinicians may have multiple options when selecting parameters for use during intervention.

摘要

如果在并发操作安排中发现某些参数(例如,强化物质量)更受青睐,那么这些参数应该被纳入到智力障碍个体的技能维持干预中。然而,由于并发操作安排的结果可能无法预测单项操作评估的结果,因此具有较少首选参数的干预也可能是有效的。本研究的目的是确定通过并发操作安排确定的特定参数的偏好是否可以预测在单项操作安排中操纵两个高度和较少首选参数值时的反应。参与者在并发操作评估中分配对一个参数的反应而不是另一个参数的反应,这表明某些参数具有高度的偏好。然而,两个不太受青睐的参数值的偶然呈现增加了对与单项操作安排中两个高度受青睐的参数所达到的相似水平的依从性。这些发现表明,临床医生在选择干预期间使用的参数时可能有多种选择。

相似文献

1
Evaluating different values of effort and reinforcement parameters under concurrent- and single-operant arrangements.评估在并发和单项操作安排下不同努力值和强化值。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 May;52(2):516-533. doi: 10.1002/jaba.533. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
2
Effects of reinforcement choice on task responding in individuals with developmental disabilities.强化物选择对发育障碍个体任务反应的影响。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1997 Fall;30(3):411-22. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1997.30-411.
3
Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.分布式和累积强化安排:疗效和偏好评估。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2014 Summer;47(2):293-313. doi: 10.1002/jaba.116. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
4
A preference analysis of reinforcer variation and choice.强化物变化与选择的偏好分析
J Appl Behav Anal. 2021 Jun;54(3):1062-1074. doi: 10.1002/jaba.835. Epub 2021 May 14.
5
A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.两种为重度和极重度残疾人士识别强化物方法的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1992 Summer;25(2):491-8. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1992.25-491.
6
Context influences preference for and level of physical activity of adolescents with intellectual and developmental disabilities.环境会影响智力和发育障碍青少年对体育活动的偏好和参与程度。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2019 Jul;52(3):788-795. doi: 10.1002/jaba.582. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
7
Response allocation to concurrent fixed-ratio reinforcement schedules with work requirements by adults with mental retardation and typical preschool children.智障成年人和典型学龄前儿童对具有工作要求的并发固定比率强化程序的反应分配。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1998 Spring;31(1):43-63. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1998.31-43.
8
A comparison of presession and within-session reinforcement choice.会前与会中强化选择的比较。
J Appl Behav Anal. 1999 Summer;32(2):161-73. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-161.
9
Effects of a history of differential reinforcement on preference for choice.历史差异强化对选择偏好的影响。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Mar;95(2):189-202. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2011.95-189.
10
A demonstration of individual preference for novel mands during functional communication training.在功能性沟通训练期间对新颖要求的个体偏好的一种展示。
J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Spring;42(1):185-9. doi: 10.1901/jaba.2009.42-185.