Palacios Jorge E, Richards Derek, Palmer Riley, Coudray Carissa, Hofmann Stefan G, Palmieri Patrick A, Frazier Patricia
E-mental Health Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Dublin, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Clinical Research & Innovation, SilverCloud Health, Dublin, Ireland.
JMIR Ment Health. 2018 Dec 14;5(4):e11467. doi: 10.2196/11467.
Many university campuses have limited mental health services that cannot cope with the high demand. One alternative is to use internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) as a way of tackling barriers such as lack of availability and scheduling issues.
This study aimed to assess feasibility, acceptability, effectiveness, and satisfaction of a supported iCBT intervention offering 3 programs on depression, anxiety, and stress to university students. The design was an open or nonrandomized feasibility trial.
Participants were recruited from 3 counseling centers at a large midwestern University in the United States. Those agreeing to take part chose 1 of 3 iCBT programs-Space from Depression, Space from Anxiety, or Space from Stress -all comprised 8 modules of media-rich interactive content. Participants were supported throughout the trial by a trained professional. The Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9), Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 (GAD-7) questionnaire, and stress subscale of the Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) were completed at baseline, 8 weeks, and 3-month follow-up. A Satisfaction With Treatment (SAT) questionnaire was completed at 8 weeks, and qualitative interviews were completed by a subsample of participants at 3 months.
A total of 102 participants were recruited, with 52 choosing Space from Anxiety, 31 choosing Space from Depression, and 19 choosing Space from Stress. Mixed-effects models showed a significant decrease in symptoms of depression (F=6.36, P<.001), anxiety (F=7.97, P<.001), and stress (F=8.50, P<.001) over time across all 3 programs. The largest decreases in PHQ-9 scores at 8 weeks were among participants who chose the Space from Depression program (d=0.84); at 3 months, the largest decreases in PHQ-9 scores were among those who chose the Space from Stress program (d=0.74). The largest decreases in GAD-7 scores were among those who chose the Space from Anxiety program (d=0.74 at 8 weeks and d=0.94 at 3 months). The largest decrease in DASS-21 stress subscale scores was among those who chose the Space from Stress program (d=0.49 at 8 weeks and d=1.16 at 3 months). The mean time spent using the platform per session was 27.4 min (SD 33.8), and participants completed 53% (SD 37.6) of the total program content on average. Most (37/53, 69%) participants found the programs helpful or very helpful and liked the convenience and flexibility of the intervention. Qualitative interviews (n=14) indicated the intervention met students' expectations, and they saw it as a valuable complement to face-to-face treatment.
The iCBT programs tested in our study appear to be feasible, acceptable, and effective in a university environment. Participants described the benefits of having a flexible, supported Web-based intervention available on campus. Larger trials should be conducted to further test the effectiveness of supported Web-based interventions that give students a choice of program depending on their symptom profile.
许多大学校园的心理健康服务有限,无法满足高需求。一种替代方法是使用互联网认知行为疗法(iCBT)来解决诸如服务不足和预约问题等障碍。
本研究旨在评估一项支持性iCBT干预措施的可行性、可接受性、有效性和满意度,该干预措施为大学生提供关于抑郁、焦虑和压力的3个项目。研究设计为开放或非随机可行性试验。
参与者从美国中西部一所大型大学的3个咨询中心招募。同意参与的人从3个iCBT项目中选择1个——“摆脱抑郁空间”、“摆脱焦虑空间”或“摆脱压力空间”,所有项目均包含8个模块的丰富媒体互动内容。在整个试验过程中,参与者由一名经过培训的专业人员提供支持。在基线、8周和3个月随访时完成患者健康问卷9(PHQ - 9)、广泛性焦虑症7(GAD - 7)问卷以及抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS - 21)的压力分量表。在8周时完成治疗满意度(SAT)问卷,并在3个月时对部分参与者进行定性访谈。
共招募了102名参与者,其中52人选择“摆脱焦虑空间”,31人选择“摆脱抑郁空间”,19人选择“摆脱压力空间”。混合效应模型显示,在所有3个项目中,随着时间推移,抑郁(F = 6.36,P <.001)、焦虑(F = 7.97,P <.001)和压力(F = 8.50,P <.001)症状均显著减轻。在8周时,PHQ - 9得分下降最大的是选择“摆脱抑郁空间”项目的参与者(d = 0.84);在3个月时,PHQ - 9得分下降最大的是选择“摆脱压力空间”项目的参与者(d = 0.74)。GAD - 7得分下降最大的是选择“摆脱焦虑空间”项目的参与者(8周时d = 0.74,3个月时d = 0.94)。DASS - 21压力分量表得分下降最大的是选择“摆脱压力空间”项目的参与者(8周时d = 0.49,3个月时d = 1.16)。每次使用平台的平均时间为27.4分钟(标准差33.8),参与者平均完成了总项目内容的53%(标准差37.6)。大多数(37/53,69%)参与者认为这些项目有帮助或非常有帮助,并喜欢该干预措施的便利性和灵活性。定性访谈(n = 14)表明该干预措施符合学生的期望,他们将其视为面对面治疗的宝贵补充。
我们研究中测试的iCBT项目在大学环境中似乎是可行、可接受且有效的。参与者描述了在校园中提供灵活、有支持性的基于网络的干预措施的好处。应进行更大规模的试验,以进一步测试根据学生症状特征提供项目选择的支持性基于网络的干预措施的有效性。