• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与选择接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧乳房切除术相关的因素。

Factors associated with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomy.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, 20 York Street, 1st Floor, Suite A, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.040
PMID:30554666
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Factors associated with the decision to pursue unilateral mastectomy (UM) versus contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) in unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients, and satisfaction with this decision, remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

UBC patients who underwent mastectomy were surveyed regarding factors affecting their surgical decision and satisfaction with the same.

RESULTS

Both UM (n = 46) and CPM (n = 55) patients were satisfied with their surgical decision (mean 4.72 and 4.85 out of 5 on Satisfaction With Decision scale, respectively, p = 0.078). Most CPM patients cited the desire to lower their risk of contralateral breast cancer (96.4%) and the desire for peace of mind (94.5%) as "very important" drivers of their decision; whereas most UM patients felt not wanting to remove a normal breast (67.4%) was a "very important" driver for their decision.

CONCLUSIONS

Both UM and CPM patients reported high satisfaction with their surgical decisions, despite differing reasons for their respective surgeries.

摘要

背景

在单侧乳腺癌(UBC)患者中,决定行单侧乳房切除术(UM)还是对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)的相关因素以及对该决策的满意度仍有待阐明。

方法

对接受乳房切除术的 UBC 患者进行了关于影响其手术决策的因素及其对手术决策的满意度的调查。

结果

UM(n=46)和 CPM(n=55)患者对手术决策均表示满意(满意度评分量表上的平均得分为 4.72 和 4.85,分别,p=0.078)。大多数 CPM 患者表示降低对侧乳腺癌风险(96.4%)和获得安心(94.5%)的愿望是其决定的“非常重要”驱动因素;而大多数 UM 患者认为不想切除正常乳房(67.4%)是其决定的“非常重要”驱动因素。

结论

尽管 UM 和 CPM 患者行不同的手术,但均报告对手术决策的满意度较高。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy versus unilateral mastectomy.与选择接受对侧预防性乳房切除术与单侧乳房切除术相关的因素。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):170-174. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.11.040. Epub 2018 Dec 8.
2
Active Participation in Decision-Making in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy for Patients With Breast Cancer.主动参与乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策。
J Surg Res. 2019 Oct;242:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.037. Epub 2019 May 7.
3
Effect of decision-making resources on satisfaction with decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).决策资源对接受预防性对侧乳房切除术(CPM)决策满意度的影响。
Am J Surg. 2020 Jun;219(6):1036-1038. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.09.021. Epub 2019 Sep 21.
4
Long-Term Satisfaction and Body Image After Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.对侧预防性乳房切除术后的长期满意度和身体形象
Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jun;24(6):1499-1506. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5753-7. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
5
"It felt like unfinished business, it feels like that's finished now": Women's experiences of decision making around contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM).“感觉就像未竟之事,现在感觉已经结束了”:女性在决定是否进行对侧预防性乳房切除术(CPM)时的体验。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jun;28(6):1328-1334. doi: 10.1002/pon.5086. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
6
Impact of anticipated financial burden on patient decision to undergo contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.预期经济负担对患者行对侧预防性乳房切除术决策的影响。
Surgery. 2018 Oct;164(4):856-865. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2018.05.038. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
7
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for patients with unilateral breast cancer.单侧乳腺癌患者的对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2007 Aug;7(8):1117-22. doi: 10.1586/14737140.7.8.1117.
8
An Evaluation of the Choice for Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy and Patient Concerns About Recurrence in a Reconstructed Cohort.重建队列中对侧预防性乳房切除术选择及患者对复发担忧的评估
Ann Plast Surg. 2018 Apr;80(4):333-338. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001258.
9
Decision-making experiences of breast cancer patients related to contralateral prophylactic mastectomy-a systematic meta-synthesis of qualitative studies.乳腺癌患者对侧预防性乳房切除术的决策经历——定性研究的系统元综合分析
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 15;31(4):214. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07674-x.
10
Tradeoffs Associated With Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women Choosing Breast Reconstruction: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Cohort.选择乳房重建的女性对侧预防性乳房切除术的权衡:一项前瞻性多中心队列研究结果
Ann Surg. 2017 Jul;266(1):158-164. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001840.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of rurality and travel distance on contralateral prophylactic mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.农村环境和交通距离对单侧乳腺癌患者行预防性对侧乳房切除术的影响。
Cancer Causes Control. 2023 Dec;34(Suppl 1):171-186. doi: 10.1007/s10552-023-01689-9. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
2
EBCC-13 manifesto: Balancing pros and cons for contralateral prophylactic mastectomy.EBCC-13 宣言:权衡利弊,决定是否行对侧预防性乳房切除术。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Mar;181:79-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.036. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
3
Nationwide Trends in Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomies: An Analysis of 55,060 Unilateral Breast Cancer Patients.
对侧预防性乳房切除术的全国趋势:对55,060例单侧乳腺癌患者的分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 May 25;10(5):e4344. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004344. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Contralateral risk-reducing local therapy in breast cancer patients with BRCA1/2 mutations: systemic review and meta-analysis.携带BRCA1/2突变的乳腺癌患者对侧降低风险的局部治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cancer Cell Int. 2021 Sep 25;21(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12935-021-02194-2.
5
Surgical Decision-Making Surrounding Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy: Comparison of Treatment Goals, Preferences, and Psychosocial Outcomes from a Multicenter Survey of Breast Cancer Patients.围绕着对侧预防性乳房切除术的手术决策:一项对乳腺癌患者进行的多中心调查的治疗目标、偏好和心理社会结果比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):8752-8765. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10426-y. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
6
Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in breast cancer: what to discuss with patients.乳腺癌的对侧预防性乳房切除术:与患者讨论的内容。
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2020 Mar;20(3):159-166. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2020.1732213. Epub 2020 Feb 28.