Smith Blake, Zhang Jessica, Pham Gina Nhu, Pakanati Keerthana, Raol Nikhila, Ongkasuwan Julina, Anne Samantha
Cleveland Clinic, Head and Neck Institute, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44995, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Children's Hospital, 6701 Fannin, Suite 640, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 Jan;116:114-117. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 23.
Health care disparities are noted between different socioeconomic groups; it is crucial to recognize and correct disparities, if present, that extend to children with hearing loss. The objective of the study is to evaluate the effect of socioeconomic status (SES) on access to hearing rehabilitation and speech and language therapy and outcomes in children with hearing loss.
Retrospective Chart Review of children diagnosed with hearing loss at 3 tertiary care academic centers from 2010 to 2012. Two hundred patients were then randomly selected from each institution for analysis. International and self-pay patients were excluded. They were separated into two groups based on SES using insurance coverage as proxy for financial status (private insurance versus Medicaid). Main outcome measures included number of hearing aid evaluations recommended andcompleted, compliance with hearing aids use, diagnosis on speech therapy evaluations, participation in speech therapy, and outcomes noted on the last speech therapy session in patients' medical record at time of study completion.
600 patients were identified by random selection out of total of 3679 patients. 18 were excluded because they were international pay or self-pay. Of 582 patients, 299 (51.4%) had private insurance and 283 (48.6%) had Medicaid. The pure tone average (PTA) at initial diagnosis did not differ between the two populations (left ear p = 0.74, right ear p = 0.68). There was no significant difference in the number of hearing aid evaluations recommended (p = 0.49), hearing aid evaluation completed (p = 0.68), or documented hearing aid compliance (p = 0.68) between the two populations. Similarly, there was no significant difference in the presence of speech delay (p = 0.62), the receipt of speech therapy (p = 0.49), or speech language outcomes between the two groups (p = 0.45).
This study suggests that despite lower socioeconomic status, in children with hearing loss, Medicaid allows equivalent access to hearing rehabilitation and speech therapy as their privately insured counterparts and children achieve similar speech and language outcomes.
不同社会经济群体之间存在医疗保健差异;识别并纠正存在的差异至关重要,这些差异若存在于听力损失儿童中则更是如此。本研究的目的是评估社会经济地位(SES)对听力损失儿童获得听力康复及言语和语言治疗的机会以及治疗结果的影响。
对2010年至2012年在3家三级医疗学术中心被诊断为听力损失的儿童进行回顾性病历审查。然后从每个机构随机选取200名患者进行分析。排除国际患者和自费患者。根据SES将他们分为两组,以保险覆盖情况作为财务状况的代理指标(私人保险与医疗补助)。主要结局指标包括推荐并完成的助听器评估次数、助听器使用依从性、言语治疗评估诊断、参与言语治疗情况,以及在研究完成时患者病历中最后一次言语治疗 session 记录的结局。
从总共3679名患者中随机选取了600名患者。18名患者因是国际付费或自费而被排除。在582名患者中,299名(51.4%)有私人保险,283名(48.6%)有医疗补助。两组人群初次诊断时的纯音平均听阈(PTA)无差异(左耳p = 0.74,右耳p = 0.68)。两组人群在推荐的助听器评估次数(p = 0.49)、完成的助听器评估次数(p = 0.68)或记录的助听器依从性(p = 0.68)方面无显著差异。同样,两组在言语延迟情况(p = 0.62)、接受言语治疗情况(p = 0.49)或言语语言结局方面也无显著差异(p = 0.45)。
本研究表明,尽管社会经济地位较低,但对于听力损失儿童,医疗补助使他们获得听力康复和言语治疗的机会与有私人保险的儿童相当,并且儿童能取得相似的言语和语言治疗结果。