Leucht W J, Rabe D R, Humbert K D
Universitäts-Frauenklinik Heidelberg, West-Germany.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 1988;14 Suppl 1:59-73. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(88)90048-8.
Use of breast sonography for clarification of pathological alterations in the breast is continuously increasing. It is known that cystic processes can be distinguished from solid processes with this method. The question of, to what extent, a prognosis of pathological relevance of such processes can be made, is of increased interest. This prognosis of pathological relevance is related to interpretative criteria which are not uniformly defined all over the world and which are also differently applied. The present investigation (evaluation of 755 sonographic focal findings) shows the rating value of each individual appraisal criterion and provides information on the certainty with which malignant and benign lesions in the breast can be distinguished. All interpretative criteria specified have a statistical significant difference (p less than 0.0001, 0.0044) in their rating pattern in malignant and benign processes. The criterion with the highest value is the wall contour. In principle, every sonographic focal finding should be examined with regard to its wall contour, the acoustic attitude of posterior wall, the internal echo pattern and the internal echogenicity. In the dynamic part of the investigation, alterations in the form and structure of the lesion must be registered. In our opinion there is a high probability of distinguishing malignant from benign processes by means of the mentioned criteria.
乳腺超声检查用于明确乳腺病理改变的应用正在不断增加。众所周知,通过这种方法可以区分囊性病变和实性病变。对于这些病变的病理相关性预后能做到何种程度这一问题,人们的兴趣日益浓厚。这种病理相关性的预后与解释标准相关,而这些标准在世界各地并未统一界定,应用方式也有所不同。本研究(对755个超声局灶性发现的评估)显示了每个评估标准的评级值,并提供了关于区分乳腺恶性和良性病变的确定性信息。所有指定的解释标准在恶性和良性病变中的评级模式均存在统计学显著差异(p小于0.0001、0.0044)。价值最高的标准是壁轮廓。原则上,每个超声局灶性发现都应检查其壁轮廓、后壁的声学特征、内部回声模式和内部回声强度。在研究的动态部分,必须记录病变形态和结构的变化。我们认为,通过上述标准很有可能区分恶性和良性病变。