School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Faculty of Pharmacy, Showa Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.
Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2019 Jan;19(1):35-43. doi: 10.1111/ggi.13562. Epub 2018 Dec 16.
In Japan, home pharmaceutical care (HPC) has recently been provided to home-bound older adults who have difficulties in accessing a community pharmacy, for regular medicine supplies and medication management. Although the number of HPC services provided has increased, HPC is not always carried out by clinically well-trained pharmacists, causing differences in the quality of HPC provided. The aim of the present study was to establish the quality dimensions of HPC (i.e. components that impact the quality of HPC) from the perspectives of home healthcare professionals.
Semistructured interviews and focus groups were carried out with nine home healthcare teams, comprising 61 multidisciplinary professionals including pharmacists, doctors, nurses, care managers, home helpers, medical social workers and other relevant stakeholders involved in home healthcare. Participants' responses were analyzed using thematic analysis. Identified themes were then categorized using Donabedian's framework (structure, process and outcome).
Nine themes and 27 subthemes emerged, including: structure (pharmacist factors, pharmacy factors and external factors), process (before HPC, during HPC, after HPC and outside of HPC) and outcome (impact on patients and impact on other healthcare professionals).
This study has identified quality dimensions of HPC from multidisciplinary home healthcare professionals' perspectives. These findings might be used to inform aspects of HPC that require improvement. In order to evaluate the quality of HPC, a set of indicators based on the identified quality dimensions could be developed. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2019; 19: 35-43.
在日本,居家药学服务(HPC)最近已经为那些难以前往社区药店的居家老年患者提供,以满足他们定期用药和药物管理的需求。尽管提供的 HPC 服务数量有所增加,但 HPC 并不总是由临床训练有素的药剂师提供,导致提供的 HPC 质量存在差异。本研究旨在从家庭医疗保健专业人员的角度确定 HPC 的质量维度(即影响 HPC 质量的组成部分)。
对 9 个家庭医疗保健团队进行了半结构式访谈和焦点小组讨论,这些团队由 61 名多学科专业人员组成,包括药剂师、医生、护士、护理经理、家庭助手、医疗社会工作者以及其他与家庭医疗保健相关的利益相关者。使用主题分析对参与者的回答进行分析。然后使用 Donabedian 框架(结构、过程和结果)对确定的主题进行分类。
共出现 9 个主题和 27 个子主题,包括:结构(药剂师因素、药房因素和外部因素)、过程(HPC 之前、HPC 期间、HPC 之后和 HPC 之外)和结果(对患者的影响和对其他医疗保健专业人员的影响)。
本研究从多学科家庭医疗保健专业人员的角度确定了 HPC 的质量维度。这些发现可能用于告知需要改进的 HPC 方面。为了评估 HPC 的质量,可以根据确定的质量维度制定一套指标。老年医学与老年病学国际 2019 年;19:35-43。