1 Doctoral School of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
2 Institute of Psychology, ELTE Eötvös Loránd University , Budapest, Hungary.
J Behav Addict. 2018 Dec 1;7(4):875-879. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.122. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
We live in exciting times for the scientific study of work addiction, given its increased relevance and the diverse perspectives one might take to approach this phenomenon. Simultaneously, this field does not appear to be unified as a result of several misleading myths, which are addressed by the debate paper of Griffiths et al. (2018). In response, we would like to complement this study by proposing that the construct of interest should be more precisely identified in the context of related constructs and that an integrative framework should be applied, which is able to take into account not just the micro-level characteristics (i.e., individual differences), but meso- (i.e., environmental factors) and macro-level (i.e., societal factors) ones as well.
我们正生活在一个工作成瘾的科学研究令人兴奋的时代,因为它的相关性增加了,人们可能会从不同的角度来研究这种现象。同时,由于一些具有误导性的神话,这个领域似乎并没有统一,格里菲斯等人的辩论论文对此进行了探讨。(2018 年)。作为回应,我们希望通过提出以下观点来补充这项研究:在相关结构的背景下,更准确地确定感兴趣的结构,并且应用一个综合框架,不仅能够考虑微观层面的特征(即个体差异),还能够考虑中观层面的特征(即环境因素)和宏观层面的特征(即社会因素)。