School of Dentistry, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Forsyth Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
J Clin Periodontol. 2019 Jan;46(1):6-11. doi: 10.1111/jcpe.13046.
Historically, inflammatory periodontal diseases (gingivitis and periodontitis) have been recognized as being primarily of bacterial origin. Bacteria are necessary for disease development, but the presence of specific bacteria does not guarantee progression to periodontitis. Periodontitis is a multifactorial disease; specific bacteria are associated with disease, but may not be the target of treatment. Gingivitis and periodontitis are inflammatory conditions associated with bacterial overgrowth.
To analyse evidence for established thought that specific bacteria directly participate in the pathogenesis of periodontitis and question the long-held tenet that penetration of the periodontal connective tissues by bacteria and their products is a significant phase in the initial development of periodontitis.
The literature was searched for studies on initiation of gingivitis and periodontitis by specific pathogens. The search results were insufficient for a systematic review and have been summarized in a commentary instead.
There is very little evidence in the literature to support the commonly held concept that specific bacteria initiate periodontitis.
We present evidence for a paradigm supporting the central role of inflammation, rather than specific microbiota, in the early pathogenesis of periodontitis, and discuss whether controlling the inflammation can influence the character and composition of the periodontal infection.
从历史上看,炎症性牙周病(牙龈炎和牙周炎)被认为主要是由细菌引起的。细菌是疾病发展所必需的,但特定细菌的存在并不能保证发展为牙周炎。牙周炎是一种多因素疾病;特定的细菌与疾病有关,但可能不是治疗的靶点。牙龈炎和牙周炎是与细菌过度生长相关的炎症性疾病。
分析特定细菌直接参与牙周炎发病机制的既定观点的证据,并质疑长期以来的观点,即细菌及其产物穿透牙周结缔组织是牙周炎初始发展的重要阶段。
检索有关特定病原体引起牙龈炎和牙周炎发病的文献。由于文献检索结果不足以为系统评价提供依据,因此以评论的形式进行了总结。
文献中几乎没有证据支持特定细菌引发牙周炎的普遍概念。
我们提出了一个支持炎症而不是特定微生物群在牙周炎早期发病机制中起核心作用的范例,并讨论了控制炎症是否会影响牙周感染的特征和组成。