University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Psychiatry, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Eur J Neurosci. 2019 Jun;49(12):1575-1586. doi: 10.1111/ejn.14308. Epub 2019 Jan 1.
Proactive inhibition - the anticipation of having to stop a response - relies on objective information contained in cue-related contingencies in the environment, as well as on the subjective interpretation derived from these cues. To date, most studies of brain areas underlying proactive inhibition have exclusively considered the objective predictive value of environmental cues, by varying the probability of stop-signals. However, by only taking into account the effect of different cues on brain activation, the subjective component of how cues affect behavior is ignored. We used a modified stop-signal response task that includes a measurement for subjective expectation, to investigate the effect of this subjective interpretation. After presenting a cue indicating the probability that a stop-signal will occur, subjects were asked whether they expected a stop-signal to occur. Furthermore, response time was used to retrospectively model brain activation related to stop-expectation. We found more activation during the cue period for 50% stop-signal probability, when contrasting with 0%, in the mid and inferior frontal gyrus, inferior parietal lobe and putamen. When contrasting expected vs. unexpected trials, we found modest effects in the mid frontal gyrus, parietal, and occipital areas. With our third contrast, we modeled brain activation during the cue with trial-by-trial variances in response times. This yielded activation in the putamen, inferior parietal lobe, and mid frontal gyrus. Our study is the first to use the behavioral effects of proactive inhibition to identify the underlying brain regions, by employing an unbiased task-design that temporally separates cue and response.
前摄性抑制——即预期需要停止反应——依赖于环境中与线索相关的偶然事件所包含的客观信息,以及这些线索所产生的主观解释。迄今为止,大多数关于前摄性抑制的大脑区域的研究仅通过改变停止信号的概率来考虑环境线索的客观预测值。然而,通过仅考虑不同线索对大脑激活的影响,就忽略了线索如何影响行为的主观成分。我们使用了一种经过修改的停止信号反应任务,其中包括对主观期望的测量,以研究这种主观解释的效果。在呈现一个表示停止信号出现概率的线索后,要求受试者回答他们是否期望出现停止信号。此外,还使用反应时间来回顾性地模拟与停止期望相关的大脑激活。我们发现,当与 0%的停止信号概率相比时,在中侧和下额回、下顶叶和壳核中,在 50%的停止信号概率下,线索期间的激活更多。当对比预期与非预期试验时,我们在中额回、顶叶和枕叶区域发现了适度的影响。在我们的第三个对比中,我们通过反应时间的逐试方差来模拟线索期间的大脑激活。这导致了壳核、下顶叶和中额回的激活。我们的研究首次使用前摄性抑制的行为效应来识别潜在的大脑区域,采用了一种无偏的任务设计,该设计在时间上区分了线索和反应。