Leunissen Inge, Coxon James P, Swinnen Stephan P
KU Leuven, Movement Control and Neuroplasticity Research Group, Leuven, Belgium.
Movement Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Auckland, New Zealand.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2016 Dec;37(12):4706-4717. doi: 10.1002/hbm.23338. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
Increasing a participant's ability to prepare for response inhibition is known to result in longer Go response times and is thought to engage a "top-down fronto-striatal inhibitory task set." This premise is supported by the observation of anterior striatum activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) analyses that focus on uncertain versus certain Go trials. It is assumed that setting up a proactive inhibitory task set also influences how participants subsequently implement stopping. To assess this assumption, we aimed to manipulate the degree of proactive inhibition in a modified stop-signal task to see how this manipulation influences activation when reacting to the Stop cue. Specifically, we tested whether there is differential activity of basal ganglia nuclei, namely the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and anterior striatum, on Stop trials when stop-signal probability was relatively low (20%) or high (40%). Successful stopping was associated with increased STN activity when Stop trials were infrequent and increased caudate head activation when Stop trials were more likely, suggesting a different implementation of reactive response inhibition by the basal ganglia for differing degrees of proactive response control. Hum Brain Mapp 37:4706-4717, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
提高参与者为反应抑制做准备的能力会导致更长的“继续”反应时间,并且被认为涉及一种“自上而下的额纹状体抑制任务集”。这一前提得到了功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)分析中对不确定与确定“继续”试验的观察结果的支持,该分析观察到了前纹状体的激活。据推测,建立一个主动抑制任务集也会影响参与者随后实施停止的方式。为了评估这一假设,我们旨在通过修改停止信号任务来操纵主动抑制的程度,以观察这种操纵在对停止提示做出反应时如何影响激活情况。具体而言,我们测试了在停止信号概率相对较低(20%)或较高(40%)时,基底神经节核团,即丘脑底核(STN)和前纹状体,在停止试验中的活动是否存在差异。当停止试验不频繁时,成功停止与STN活动增加相关;当停止试验更有可能出现时,成功停止与尾状核头部激活增加相关,这表明基底神经节对不同程度的主动反应控制进行反应性反应抑制的方式不同。《人类大脑图谱》37:4706 - 4717,2016年。© 2016威利期刊公司。