• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化单纯性急性阑尾炎的抗生素治疗:一项多中心随机临床试验方案(APPAC II试验)。

Optimising the antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial (APPAC II trial).

作者信息

Haijanen J, Sippola S, Grönroos J, Rautio T, Nordström P, Rantanen T, Aarnio M, Ilves I, Hurme S, Marttila H, Virtanen J, Mattila A, Paajanen H, Salminen P

机构信息

Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital, Kiinanmyllynkatu 4-8, 20520, Turku, Finland.

Department of Surgery, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0451-y.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-018-0451-y
PMID:30558607
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6296129/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Based on epidemiological and clinical data acute appendicitis can present either as uncomplicated (70-80%) or complicated (20-30%) disease. Recent studies have shown that antibiotic therapy is both safe and cost-effective for a CT-scan confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. However, based on the study protocols to ensure patient safety, these randomised studies used mainly broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics requiring additional hospital resources and prolonged hospital stay. As we now know that antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis is feasible and safe, further studies evaluating optimisation of the antibiotic treatment regarding both antibiotic spectrum and shorter hospital stay are needed to evaluate antibiotics as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

METHODS

APPAC II trial is a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority randomised controlled trial comparing per oral (p.o.) antibiotic monotherapy with intravenous (i.v.) antibiotic therapy followed by p.o. antibiotics in the treatment of CT-scan confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Adult patients with CT-scan diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendicitis will be enrolled in nine Finnish hospitals. The intended sample size is 552 patients. Primary endpoint is the success of the randomised treatment, defined as resolution of acute appendicitis resulting in discharge from the hospital without the need for surgical intervention and no recurrent appendicitis during one-year follow-up. Secondary endpoints include post-intervention complications, late recurrence of acute appendicitis after one year, duration of hospital stay, pain, quality of life, sick leave and treatment costs. Primary endpoint will be evaluated in two stages: point estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) will be calculated for both groups and proportion difference between groups with 95% CI will be calculated and evaluated based on 6 percentage point non-inferiority margin.

DISCUSSION

To our knowledge, APPAC II trial is the first randomised controlled trial comparing per oral antibiotic monotherapy with intravenous antibiotic therapy continued by per oral antibiotics in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The APPAC II trial aims to add clinical evidence on the debated role of antibiotics as the first-line treatment for a CT-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis as well as to optimise the non-operative treatment for uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov , NCT03236961, retrospectively registered on the 2nd of August 2017.

摘要

背景

基于流行病学和临床数据,急性阑尾炎可表现为单纯性(70 - 80%)或复杂性(20 - 30%)疾病。近期研究表明,对于CT扫描确诊的单纯性急性阑尾炎,抗生素治疗既安全又具有成本效益。然而,根据确保患者安全的研究方案,这些随机研究主要使用广谱静脉抗生素,这需要额外的医院资源并延长住院时间。由于我们现在知道单纯性急性阑尾炎的抗生素治疗是可行且安全的,因此需要进一步研究以评估在抗生素谱和缩短住院时间方面优化抗生素治疗,从而将抗生素作为单纯性急性阑尾炎的一线治疗方法进行评估。

方法

APPAC II试验是一项多中心、开放标签、非劣效性随机对照试验,比较口服抗生素单药治疗与静脉抗生素治疗后序贯口服抗生素治疗CT扫描确诊的单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效。芬兰的九家医院将招募CT扫描诊断为单纯性急性阑尾炎的成年患者。预期样本量为552例患者。主要终点是随机治疗的成功,定义为急性阑尾炎消退,患者出院且无需手术干预,并且在一年随访期间无复发性阑尾炎。次要终点包括干预后并发症、一年后急性阑尾炎的晚期复发、住院时间、疼痛、生活质量、病假和治疗费用。主要终点将分两个阶段进行评估:计算两组的点估计值及其95%置信区间(CI),并计算两组之间比例差异及其95%CI,并基于6个百分点的非劣效性界值进行评估。

讨论

据我们所知,APPAC II试验是第一项比较口服抗生素单药治疗与静脉抗生素治疗后序贯口服抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的随机对照试验。APPAC II试验旨在为抗生素作为CT确诊的单纯性急性阑尾炎一线治疗方法这一备受争议的作用增加临床证据,并优化单纯性急性阑尾炎的非手术治疗。

试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov,NCT03236961,于2017年8月2日进行回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1da/6296129/6250ba257b16/12893_2018_451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1da/6296129/6250ba257b16/12893_2018_451_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c1da/6296129/6250ba257b16/12893_2018_451_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimising the antibiotic treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical trial (APPAC II trial).优化单纯性急性阑尾炎的抗生素治疗:一项多中心随机临床试验方案(APPAC II试验)。
BMC Surg. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):117. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0451-y.
2
A randomised placebo-controlled double-blind multicentre trial comparing antibiotic therapy with placebo in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: APPAC III trial study protocol.一项比较抗生素治疗与安慰剂治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的随机、安慰剂对照、双盲多中心试验:APPAC III试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Nov 3;8(11):e023623. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023623.
3
Three-Year Outcomes of Oral Antibiotics vs Intravenous and Oral Antibiotics for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of the APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服抗生素与静脉和口服抗生素治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的 3 年结局:APPAC II 随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Jul 1;159(7):727-735. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.5947.
4
Prospective multicentre cohort trial on acute appendicitis and microbiota, aetiology and effects of antimicrobial treatment: study protocol for the MAPPAC (Microbiology APPendicitis ACuta) trial.前瞻性多中心队列研究急性阑尾炎及其微生物群、病因和抗菌治疗效果:MAPPAC(微生物学急性阑尾炎)试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 6;9(9):e031137. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031137.
5
Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的比较:APPAC 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.
6
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.
7
A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC trial).一项比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照多中心试验(APPAC试验)。
BMC Surg. 2013 Feb 8;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-3.
8
Five-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis in the APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中单纯性急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗的 5 年随访。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 25;320(12):1259-1265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.13201.
9
Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的经济学评价。
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1355-1361. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10575. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
Cost analysis of antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: 5-year results of the APPAC randomized clinical trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的成本分析:APPAC 随机临床试验 5 年结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220202. eCollection 2019.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic factors associated with primary non-responsiveness to antibiotics and appendicitis recurrence for CT-diagnosed uncomplicated acute appendicitis: secondary analysis of two randomized clinical trials.CT诊断的单纯性急性阑尾炎对抗生素原发性无反应及阑尾炎复发的预后因素:两项随机临床试验的二次分析
Br J Surg. 2025 Jul 3;112(7). doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaf143.
2
Is non-operative treatment of acute appendicitis possible: A narrative review.急性阑尾炎非手术治疗是否可行:一项叙述性综述
Afr J Emerg Med. 2024 Jun;14(2):84-90. doi: 10.1016/j.afjem.2024.03.006. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
3
Are Antibiotics the New Appendectomy?

本文引用的文献

1
The Accuracy of Low-dose Computed Tomography Protocol in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: The OPTICAP Study.低剂量计算机断层扫描方案在疑似急性阑尾炎患者中的准确性:OPTICAP 研究。
Ann Surg. 2020 Feb;271(2):332-338. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002976.
2
Diagnostic prediction of complicated appendicitis by combined clinical and radiological appendicitis severity index (APSI).通过联合临床和影像学阑尾炎严重指数(APSI)对复杂阑尾炎进行诊断预测。
Eur Radiol. 2018 Sep;28(9):3601-3610. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5339-9. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
3
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of CT Features for Differentiating Complicated and Uncomplicated Appendicitis.
抗生素会成为新的阑尾切除术吗?
Cureus. 2023 Sep 1;15(9):e44506. doi: 10.7759/cureus.44506. eCollection 2023 Sep.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of antibiotic treatment and appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的疗效和安全性比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Surg. 2023 Jul 24;23(1):208. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02108-1.
5
The role of CT in decision for acute appendicitis treatment.CT 在急性阑尾炎治疗决策中的作用。
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2022 Nov;28(6):540-546. doi: 10.5152/dir.2022.201048.
6
Antibiotic treatment for appendicitis in Norway and Sweden: a nationwide survey on treatment practices.挪威和瑞典的阑尾炎抗生素治疗:治疗实践的全国性调查。
BMC Surg. 2022 Jun 15;22(1):229. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01680-2.
7
Diagnostic accuracy using low-dose versus standard radiation dose CT in suspected acute appendicitis: prospective cohort study.疑似急性阑尾炎中使用低剂量与标准辐射剂量 CT 的诊断准确性:前瞻性队列研究。
Br J Surg. 2021 Dec 1;108(12):1483-1490. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab383.
8
Predictive ability of CT findings in the differentiation of complicated and uncomplicated appendicitis: a retrospective investigation of 201 patients undergone appendectomy at initial admission.CT表现对复杂性和非复杂性阑尾炎鉴别的预测能力:对201例初次入院时接受阑尾切除术患者的回顾性研究
Insights Imaging. 2021 Oct 21;12(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s13244-021-01086-3.
9
Appendiceal adenocarcinoma found by surgery for acute appendicitis is associated with older age.因急性阑尾炎手术而发现的阑尾腺癌与年龄较大有关。
BMC Surg. 2021 May 2;21(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01224-0.
10
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.
系统评价和 CT 特征对鉴别复杂与单纯性阑尾炎的 Meta 分析
Radiology. 2018 Apr;287(1):104-115. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017171260. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
4
Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy for uncomplicated appendicitis.随机对照临床试验:抗生素治疗单纯性阑尾炎。
Br J Surg. 2017 Dec;104(13):1785-1790. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10660. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
5
Low-dose CT for the diagnosis of appendicitis in adolescents and young adults (LOCAT): a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.低剂量 CT 诊断青少年和年轻成人阑尾炎的多中心实用随机对照非劣效试验(LOCAT)
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Nov;2(11):793-804. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(17)30247-9. Epub 2017 Sep 12.
6
Randomized clinical trial of Appendicitis Inflammatory Response score-based management of patients with suspected appendicitis.随机对照临床试验:基于阑尾炎炎症反应评分的疑似阑尾炎患者管理。
Br J Surg. 2017 Oct;104(11):1451-1461. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10637. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
7
Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的经济学评价。
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1355-1361. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10575. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
8
LOW-DOSE CT PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS: THE OPTICAP PHANTOM STUDY.用于急性阑尾炎评估的低剂量CT方案优化:OPTICAP体模研究
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Jan 1;178(1):20-28. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx070.
9
Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults and children: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人及儿童腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
United European Gastroenterol J. 2017 Jun;5(4):542-553. doi: 10.1177/2050640616661931. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Long-Term Results Following Antibiotic Treatment of Acute Appendicitis in Adults.成人急性阑尾炎抗生素治疗后的长期结果
World J Surg. 2017 Sep;41(9):2245-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-3987-6.