Suppr超能文献

用于功能磁共振成像的本体感觉刺激频率和运动范围的优化

Optimization of Proprioceptive Stimulation Frequency and Movement Range for fMRI.

作者信息

Nurmi Timo, Henriksson Linda, Piitulainen Harri

机构信息

Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering (NBE), Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

Aalto NeuroImaging, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Dec 3;12:477. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2018.00477. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

For vision, audition and tactile sense, the optimal stimulus frequency for fMRI is somewhat known. For proprioception, i.e., the "movement sense", however, the optimal frequency is unknown. We studied the effect of passive-finger-movement frequency on proprioceptive fMRI responses using a novel pneumatic-movement actuator. Eleven healthy right-handed volunteers participated in the study. The movement actuator passively moved the participant's right index finger at frequencies of 0.3, 1, 3, 6, 9, or 12 Hz in a blocked design. A functional localizer was used to define regions-of-interest in SI and SII cortices. In addition, effect of movement range on the fMRI responses was tested in a separate session with 1, 3, 5, and 7 mm movement ranges at a fixed 2 Hz frequency. In primary somatosensory (SI) cortex, the responses were stronger at 3 Hz than at 0.3 Hz ( < 0.001) or 1 Hz ( < 0.05), and at ≥6 Hz than 0.3 Hz ( < 0.001 for frequencies ≥ 6 Hz). In secondary somatosensory (SII) cortex, all movements, except at 0.3 Hz, elicited significant responses of similar strength. In addition, 6, 9, and 12-Hz movements elicited a significant offset response in both SI and SII cortices ( < 0.001-0.05). SI cortex required a total stimulation duration of 4 min to elicit significant activations at the group-level whereas for SII cortex 1 min 20 s was sufficient. Increase in the movement range led to stronger responses in SI cortex, but not in SII cortex. Movements above 3 Hz elicited the strongest SI cortex responses, and increase in the movement range enhanced the response strength. We thus recommend that movements at with a movement range of 5 mm or higher to be used in future studies of proprioception. Our results are in-line with previous fMRI and PET studies using tactile or median nerve stimulation at different stimulation frequencies.

摘要

对于视觉、听觉和触觉而言,功能磁共振成像(fMRI)的最佳刺激频率已为人所知。然而,对于本体感觉,即“运动感觉”,最佳频率尚不清楚。我们使用一种新型气动运动执行器研究了被动手指运动频率对本体感觉fMRI反应的影响。11名健康的右利手志愿者参与了这项研究。运动执行器以0.3、1、3、6、9或12赫兹的频率,采用组块设计被动移动参与者的右手食指。使用功能定位器来定义初级体感皮层(SI)和次级体感皮层(SII)中的感兴趣区域。此外,在另一个实验环节中,以固定的2赫兹频率测试了1、3、5和7毫米的运动范围对fMRI反应的影响。在初级体感(SI)皮层中,3赫兹时的反应比0.3赫兹(<0.001)或1赫兹(<0.05)时更强,且在≥6赫兹时比0.3赫兹时更强(频率≥6赫兹时<0.001)。在次级体感(SII)皮层中,除了0.3赫兹时,所有运动都引发了强度相似的显著反应。此外,6、9和12赫兹的运动在SI和SII皮层中均引发了显著的抵消反应(<0.001 - 0.05)。SI皮层需要4分钟的总刺激持续时间才能在组水平上引发显著激活,而对于SII皮层,1分20秒就足够了。运动范围的增加导致SI皮层的反应更强,但在SII皮层中并非如此。高于3赫兹的运动引发了最强的SI皮层反应,运动范围的增加增强了反应强度。因此,我们建议在未来的本体感觉研究中使用5毫米或更高运动范围的3赫兹运动。我们的结果与之前使用不同刺激频率的触觉或正中神经刺激的fMRI和PET研究一致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c88d/6286983/cd4a2b000a43/fnhum-12-00477-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验