Suppr超能文献

基于世界医学教育联合会标准的物理治疗博士项目课程研究

Study of curriculum of Doctor of Physical therapy programme based on World Federation of Medical Education standards.

作者信息

Shakil-Ur-Rehman Syed, Ahmad Shakeel, Yasmin Raheela

机构信息

Syed Shakil-ur-Rehman, PhD PT. Professor/Principal, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Shakeel Ahmad, Assistant Professor, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):1582-1585. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.15926.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the curriculum for Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programme based on World Federation of Medical Education (WFME) standards.

METHODS

A questionnaire was constructed based on WFME 'Should' and 'Must' standards. It was validated by five experts in two rounds. It is comprised of Items/ questions with Yes/No options. The questionnaire was filled by the DPT Faculty and final year students at Riphah International University, Islamabad from March 01, to April 30, 2017.

RESULTS

The key weakness identified were students participation in program management, evaluation, mission statement, program designing, curriculum committee, students activities and organization, and other matters relevant to students, followed by the use of external examiners, reliability and validity of assessment tools, scrutiny of assessments by external examiners and feedback to the students on assessment. The integration of behavioral and social sciences, readiness of graduates for postgraduate studies, institutional autonomy and academic freedom for curriculum development and designing, and opportunity for the participation of other stakeholders were identified as strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

As per WFME standards the curriculum for DPT program needs improvements in student's assessments and their participation in program management, evaluation, mission statement and designing, along with facilitation in student's activities, organizations. Strengths of the curriculum were integration of behavioral and social sciences, readiness for postgraduate studies, institutional autonomy and academic freedom for the development and designing of curriculum, and the participation of other stakeholders.

摘要

目的

根据世界医学教育联合会(WFME)标准评估物理治疗博士(DPT)项目的课程。

方法

基于WFME的“应该”和“必须”标准编制问卷。该问卷经五位专家两轮验证。问卷由带有“是/否”选项的条目/问题组成。2017年3月1日至4月30日,伊斯兰堡里法国际大学的DPT教职员工和最后一年的学生填写了该问卷。

结果

确定的主要薄弱环节包括学生参与项目管理、评估、使命宣言、项目设计、课程委员会、学生活动与组织以及其他与学生相关的事项,其次是外部考官的使用、评估工具的可靠性和有效性、外部考官对评估的审查以及向学生提供评估反馈。行为和社会科学的整合、毕业生为研究生学习做好的准备、课程开发和设计的机构自主权和学术自由以及其他利益相关者参与的机会被确定为优势。

结论

根据WFME标准,DPT项目的课程在学生评估以及他们参与项目管理、评估、使命宣言和设计方面需要改进,同时需要在学生活动和组织方面提供便利。该课程的优势在于行为和社会科学的整合、为研究生学习做好的准备、课程开发和设计的机构自主权和学术自由以及其他利益相关者的参与。

相似文献

2
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education standards. WFME 2: educational program.
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):489-91. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0574-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
3
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards. WFME 1: mission and objectives.
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0541-z. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
5
Designing an evaluation framework for WFME basic standards for medical education.
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):291-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031737. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education Standards. WFME 3: assessment of students.
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Jun;180(2):315-7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0669-x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.

本文引用的文献

2
Contemporary medical education in remote lands.
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Apr;67(4):491-493.
3
Integrated approaches to physical Therapy education: a new comprehensive model from the University of Illinois Chicago.
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 May;33(5):353-360. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1305471. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
The potential impact of the revision of the Basic World Federation Medical Education Standards.
Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):459-62. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907881. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
Social accountability of medical education: aspects on global accreditation.
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):667-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590246.
7
International recognition of basic medical education programmes.
Med Educ. 2008 Jan;42(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02907.x.
8
No model of clinical education for physiotherapy students is superior to another: a systematic review.
Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70058-2.
9
Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME.
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S43-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4.
10
Standards and medical education.
Med Teach. 2003 Jul;25(4):349-51. doi: 10.1080/01421590310001595581.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验