• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于世界医学教育联合会标准的物理治疗博士项目课程研究

Study of curriculum of Doctor of Physical therapy programme based on World Federation of Medical Education standards.

作者信息

Shakil-Ur-Rehman Syed, Ahmad Shakeel, Yasmin Raheela

机构信息

Syed Shakil-ur-Rehman, PhD PT. Professor/Principal, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Shakeel Ahmad, Assistant Professor, Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Riphah International University, Islamabad, Pakistan.

出版信息

Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):1582-1585. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.15926.

DOI:10.12669/pjms.346.15926
PMID:30559828
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6290228/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the curriculum for Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) programme based on World Federation of Medical Education (WFME) standards.

METHODS

A questionnaire was constructed based on WFME 'Should' and 'Must' standards. It was validated by five experts in two rounds. It is comprised of Items/ questions with Yes/No options. The questionnaire was filled by the DPT Faculty and final year students at Riphah International University, Islamabad from March 01, to April 30, 2017.

RESULTS

The key weakness identified were students participation in program management, evaluation, mission statement, program designing, curriculum committee, students activities and organization, and other matters relevant to students, followed by the use of external examiners, reliability and validity of assessment tools, scrutiny of assessments by external examiners and feedback to the students on assessment. The integration of behavioral and social sciences, readiness of graduates for postgraduate studies, institutional autonomy and academic freedom for curriculum development and designing, and opportunity for the participation of other stakeholders were identified as strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

As per WFME standards the curriculum for DPT program needs improvements in student's assessments and their participation in program management, evaluation, mission statement and designing, along with facilitation in student's activities, organizations. Strengths of the curriculum were integration of behavioral and social sciences, readiness for postgraduate studies, institutional autonomy and academic freedom for the development and designing of curriculum, and the participation of other stakeholders.

摘要

目的

根据世界医学教育联合会(WFME)标准评估物理治疗博士(DPT)项目的课程。

方法

基于WFME的“应该”和“必须”标准编制问卷。该问卷经五位专家两轮验证。问卷由带有“是/否”选项的条目/问题组成。2017年3月1日至4月30日,伊斯兰堡里法国际大学的DPT教职员工和最后一年的学生填写了该问卷。

结果

确定的主要薄弱环节包括学生参与项目管理、评估、使命宣言、项目设计、课程委员会、学生活动与组织以及其他与学生相关的事项,其次是外部考官的使用、评估工具的可靠性和有效性、外部考官对评估的审查以及向学生提供评估反馈。行为和社会科学的整合、毕业生为研究生学习做好的准备、课程开发和设计的机构自主权和学术自由以及其他利益相关者参与的机会被确定为优势。

结论

根据WFME标准,DPT项目的课程在学生评估以及他们参与项目管理、评估、使命宣言和设计方面需要改进,同时需要在学生活动和组织方面提供便利。该课程的优势在于行为和社会科学的整合、为研究生学习做好的准备、课程开发和设计的机构自主权和学术自由以及其他利益相关者的参与。

相似文献

1
Study of curriculum of Doctor of Physical therapy programme based on World Federation of Medical Education standards.基于世界医学教育联合会标准的物理治疗博士项目课程研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2018 Nov-Dec;34(6):1582-1585. doi: 10.12669/pjms.346.15926.
2
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education standards. WFME 2: educational program.医学教育标准使用实用指南。WFME2:教育计划。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):489-91. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0574-3. Epub 2010 Sep 17.
3
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) standards. WFME 1: mission and objectives.医学教育认证的实用指南。世界医学教育联合会(WFME)标准 1:使命与目标。
Ir J Med Sci. 2010 Dec;179(4):483-7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0541-z. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
4
Challenges for implementing WFME standards for accreditation in health professions education in low and middle-income countries: A scoping review.在中低收入国家实施卫生专业教育认证 WFME 标准的挑战:范围综述。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2021 Mar;71(3):966-976. doi: 10.47391/JPMA.795.
5
Designing an evaluation framework for WFME basic standards for medical education.为世界医学教育联合会医学教育基本标准设计一个评估框架。
Med Teach. 2016;38(3):291-6. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1031737. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
6
A practical guide to using the World Federation for Medical Education Standards. WFME 3: assessment of students.医学教育国际标准的实用指南。WFME3:学生评估。
Ir J Med Sci. 2011 Jun;180(2):315-7. doi: 10.1007/s11845-010-0669-x. Epub 2011 Jan 4.
7
Feasibility and outcomes of paid undergraduate student nurse positions.本科护生带薪岗位的可行性与结果
Nurs Leadersh (Tor Ont). 2006 Sep;19(3):e1-14. doi: 10.12927/cjnl.2006.19032.
8
The WFME global standards for quality improvement of postgraduate medical education: Which standards are also applicable in Germany? Recommendations for physicians with a license for postgraduate training and training agents.世界医学教育联合会本科医学教育全球标准:哪些标准也适用于德国?对具有研究生培训和培训代理许可证的医生的建议。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Sep 15;39(4):Doc42. doi: 10.3205/zma001563. eCollection 2022.
9
International standards in medical education: assessment and accreditation of medical schools'--educational programmes. A WFME position paper. The Executive Council, The World Federation for Medical Education.医学教育国际标准:医学院校教育项目的评估与认证——世界医学教育联合会立场文件。世界医学教育联合会执行委员会
Med Educ. 1998 Sep;32(5):549-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1998.00302.x.
10
Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis of integrating the World Health Organization patient safety curriculum into undergraduate medical education in Pakistan: a qualitative case study.将世界卫生组织患者安全课程纳入巴基斯坦本科医学教育的优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析:一项定性案例研究
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2017 Dec 28;14:35. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2017.14.35. eCollection 2017.

引用本文的文献

1
The Councils on Chiropractic Education International Mapping Project: Comparison of Member Organizations' Educational Standards to the Councils on Chiropractic Education International Framework Document.国际脊骨神经医学教育委员会映射项目:会员组织教育标准与国际脊骨神经医学教育委员会框架文件的比较
J Chiropr Humanit. 2022 Jul 17;29:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.echu.2022.05.001. eCollection 2022 Dec.

本文引用的文献

1
Higher education needs more improvement: The case of Pakistan.高等教育需要更多改进:以巴基斯坦为例。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):821.
2
Contemporary medical education in remote lands.偏远地区的当代医学教育。
J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 Apr;67(4):491-493.
3
Integrated approaches to physical Therapy education: a new comprehensive model from the University of Illinois Chicago.物理治疗教育的综合方法:来自伊利诺伊大学芝加哥分校的一种全新综合模式。
Physiother Theory Pract. 2017 May;33(5):353-360. doi: 10.1080/09593985.2017.1305471. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
4
The potential impact of the revision of the Basic World Federation Medical Education Standards.世界医学教育基础联合会标准修订的潜在影响。
Med Teach. 2014 Jun;36(6):459-62. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.907881. Epub 2014 May 6.
5
Social accountability of medical education: aspects on global accreditation.医学教育的社会责任:全球认证方面。
Med Teach. 2011;33(8):667-72. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.590246.
6
Preparing for an institutional self review using the WFME standards - an international medical school case study.使用 WFME 标准进行机构自我审查的准备工作——国际医学院校案例研究。
Med Teach. 2010;32(5):e227-32. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.482396.
7
International recognition of basic medical education programmes.基础医学教育项目的国际认可。
Med Educ. 2008 Jan;42(1):12-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02907.x.
8
No model of clinical education for physiotherapy students is superior to another: a systematic review.没有一种针对物理治疗专业学生的临床教育模式优于另一种:一项系统综述。
Aust J Physiother. 2007;53(1):19-28. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(07)70058-2.
9
Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME.医学教育的全球标准与认证:世界医学教育联合会的观点
Acad Med. 2006 Dec;81(12 Suppl):S43-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000243383.71047.c4.
10
Standards and medical education.标准与医学教育。
Med Teach. 2003 Jul;25(4):349-51. doi: 10.1080/01421590310001595581.