• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多源评估一项针对医学生使用标准化患者进行访谈/采集临床病史的教育项目。

Multi-source evaluation of an educational program aimed at medical students for interviewing/taking the clinical history using standardized patients.

机构信息

Francisco de Vitoria University, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Medicine, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Feb 15;38(2):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001436. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3205/zma001436
PMID:33763525
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7958917/
Abstract

Simulations with standardized patients (SP) have long been used for teaching/assessing communication skills. The present study describes and evaluates an experiential training methodology aimed at medical students and based on interviews with standardized simulated patients. The training was focused on developing basic communication skills and taking medical histories. Longitudinal observational study of a cohort of third-year medical students. Three interviews with SP were carried out and videotaped. These interviews were assessed by the students, the SPs and the professors of the relevant subject areas. 83 students conducted the interviews. The self-evaluations performed by the students showed an improvement between the first and third interviews, as demonstrated by the increase of 6.7% (CI 95%=3.6-10.0%) (p<0.001) in the percentage of detected items. The SPs stated an improvement of 8.5% (CI 95%=2.9-14.1) (p=0.003) from the first to the third interview regarding the percentage of students that showed a level of interest in, and ease with, the patients' concerns. Finally, the teachers found a mean percentage of items identified in the third written clinical history of 61.4% (CI 95%=59.1-63.7) of the total available. This educational program, carried out with standardized simulated patients, showed positive signs of improvement from the first to the third interview, in both the student self-evaluations and the level of interest and ease perceived by the SPs. Additionally, the mean level of information recorded in the written medical histories was considered to be acceptable.

摘要

使用标准化患者(SP)进行模拟已经长期用于教授/评估沟通技巧。本研究描述并评估了一种针对医学生的体验式培训方法,该方法基于与标准化模拟患者的访谈。培训重点是发展基本的沟通技巧和采集病史。

对三年级医学生队列进行的纵向观察研究。与 SP 进行了三次访谈并进行了录像。学生、SP 和相关学科领域的教授对这些访谈进行了评估。

83 名学生进行了访谈。学生进行的自我评估显示,第一次和第三次访谈之间有所改善,通过增加 6.7%(95%CI 3.6-10.0%)(p<0.001)来证明,即发现项目的百分比增加了。SP 表示,从第一次到第三次访谈,在学生对患者关注的兴趣程度和舒适度方面,有 8.5%(95%CI 2.9-14.1)(p=0.003)的提高。最后,教师在第三次书面临床病史中发现了 61.4%(95%CI 95%=59.1-63.7)的可利用项目的平均百分比。

这个教育计划,与标准化模拟患者一起进行,在学生自我评估和 SP 感知的兴趣和舒适度方面,从第一次到第三次访谈都显示出积极的改善迹象。此外,书面病历中记录的信息的平均水平被认为是可以接受的。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/7f1345ec27cb/JME-38-40-g-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/8a79d07b4b8c/JME-38-40-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/f6d7f8d61fed/JME-38-40-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/ca270a9213dd/JME-38-40-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/bad0683f7d2c/JME-38-40-t-004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/565dd1cf8f77/JME-38-40-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/4b9e69b9e1f6/JME-38-40-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/7f1345ec27cb/JME-38-40-g-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/8a79d07b4b8c/JME-38-40-t-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/f6d7f8d61fed/JME-38-40-t-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/ca270a9213dd/JME-38-40-t-003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/bad0683f7d2c/JME-38-40-t-004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/565dd1cf8f77/JME-38-40-g-001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/4b9e69b9e1f6/JME-38-40-g-002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8629/7958917/7f1345ec27cb/JME-38-40-g-003.jpg

相似文献

1
Multi-source evaluation of an educational program aimed at medical students for interviewing/taking the clinical history using standardized patients.多源评估一项针对医学生使用标准化患者进行访谈/采集临床病史的教育项目。
GMS J Med Educ. 2021 Feb 15;38(2):Doc40. doi: 10.3205/zma001436. eCollection 2021.
2
Pitfalls in training simulated patients to respond appropriately to questions from medical students in family history-taking activities: the current situation surrounding the training of simulated patients for learning activities at Nippon Medical School.在培训模拟患者以便在家族史采集活动中对医学生的问题做出恰当回应时存在的问题:日本医科大学学习活动中模拟患者培训的现状
J Nippon Med Sch. 2013;80(1):57-62. doi: 10.1272/jnms.80.57.
3
Reflective teaching of medical communication skills with DiViDU: assessing the level of student reflection on recorded consultations with simulated patients.使用DiViDU进行医学沟通技能的反思性教学:评估学生对与模拟患者的会诊记录的反思水平。
Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Feb;74(2):142-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.10.009. Epub 2008 Dec 4.
4
Standardized patients in psychiatry - the best way to learn clinical skills?精神病学中的标准化病人——学习临床技能的最佳途径?
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1184-4.
5
Improving the communication skills of medical students --A survey of simulated patient-based learning in Chinese medical universities.提高医学生的沟通技巧——中国医科大学基于模拟患者的学习调查。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 13;22(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03596-0.
6
Do medical students respond empathetically to a virtual patient?医学生对虚拟病人会做出共情反应吗?
Am J Surg. 2007 Jun;193(6):756-60. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2007.01.021.
7
An observational study investigating the impact of simulated patients in teaching communication skills in preclinical dietetic students.一项观察性研究,调查模拟患者在临床前营养学学生沟通技能教学中的影响。
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Aug;29(4):529-36. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12352. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
8
The use of virtual patients to teach medical students history taking and communication skills.使用虚拟患者来教授医学生病史采集和沟通技巧。
Am J Surg. 2006 Jun;191(6):806-11. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.03.002.
9
Evaluation of a communication skills seminar for students in a Japanese medical school: a non-randomized controlled study.日本一所医学院学生沟通技巧研讨会的评估:一项非随机对照研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2004 Nov 18;4:24. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-4-24.
10
Do Standardized Patients Have Concerns About Students Not Captured by Traditional Assessment Forms?标准化病人是否对传统评估表未涵盖的学生问题有所担忧?
Teach Learn Med. 2016 Oct-Dec;28(4):395-405. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1176573. Epub 2016 May 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Designing an evaluation tool for evaluating training programs of medical students in clinical skill training center from consumers' perspective.从消费者视角出发,设计一个评估临床技能培训中心医学生培训项目的评估工具。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 9;24(1):502. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05454-7.
2
A Multifaceted Educational Intervention in the Doctor-Patient Relationship for Medical Students to Incorporate Patient Agendas in Simulated Encounters.一项针对医学生的医患关系多方面教育干预措施,旨在让学生在模拟问诊中纳入患者议程。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jun 9;11(12):1699. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11121699.
3
Medical students' experiences of working with simulated patients in challenging communication training.

本文引用的文献

1
Medical students' perceptions towards learning communication skills: a qualitative study following the 2-year training programme.医学生对学习沟通技巧的认知:一项为期两年培训项目后的定性研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2019 May 3;10:90-97. doi: 10.5116/ijme.5cbd.7e96.
2
Medical students' attitudes toward communication skills learning: comparison between two groups with and without training.医学生对沟通技能学习的态度:接受培训和未接受培训的两组学生的比较。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2019 Feb 12;10:55-61. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S182879. eCollection 2019.
3
Perceptions of a longitudinal standardized patient experience by standardized patients, medical students, and faculty.
医学生在具有挑战性的沟通训练中与模拟患者合作的经历。
Adv Simul (Lond). 2022 Oct 10;7(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41077-022-00230-3.
标准化患者、医学生和教师对纵向标准化患者体验的看法。
Med Educ Online. 2018 Dec;23(1):1548244. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2018.1548244.
4
[Promoting Health Promotion: Medical students perceptions about an educational program on behavioral change in primary care].促进健康促进:医学生对初级保健中行为改变教育项目的看法
Aten Primaria. 2019 Aug-Sep;51(7):435-441. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2018.02.013. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
5
Students' Perception of Peer and Faculty Debriefing Facilitators Following Simulation- Based Education.基于模拟教学后学生对同伴和教师反馈促进者的认知
J Allied Health. 2018 Summer;47(2):107-112.
6
Recommendations for undergraduate medical electives: a UK consensus statement.本科医学选修课推荐:英国共识声明。
Med Educ. 2018 Jan;52(1):14-23. doi: 10.1111/medu.13445. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Peer-Assisted History-Taking Groups: A Subjective Assessment of their Impact Upon Medical Students' Interview Skills.同伴辅助病史采集小组:对其对医学生问诊技巧影响的主观评估
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Aug 15;34(3):Doc35. doi: 10.3205/zma001112. eCollection 2017.
8
Teaching medical students to express empathy by exploring patient emotions and experiences in standardized medical encounters.在标准化医疗接触中探索患者的情绪和体验,教导医学生表达同理心。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Sep;100(9):1694-1700. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.04.018. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
9
The effect of video-assisted oral feedback versus oral feedback on surgical communicative competences in undergraduate training.视频辅助口头反馈与口头反馈对本科培训中手术沟通能力的影响。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug;43(4):461-466. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0734-x. Epub 2016 Oct 11.
10
A Latin American, Portuguese and Spanish consensus on a core communication curriculum for undergraduate medical education.拉丁美洲、葡萄牙和西班牙关于本科医学教育核心沟通课程的共识。
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Mar 28;16:99. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0610-8.