Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Research Unit of Holistic Health and Safety Management in Community, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2019 Aug;43(6):759-767. doi: 10.1002/jpen.1489. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
Diarrhea in enteral tube-fed patients is not uncommon and can lead to unfavorable outcomes. Fiber in enteral nutrition (EN) formula might play a role in postfeeding diarrhea. Theoretically, soluble fiber is beneficial for both prevention and treatment of postfeeding diarrhea, but different types of soluble fiber may not provide the same effect. This study aims to determine whether supplementation with psyllium in standard EN reduces the incidence of diarrhea in tube-fed patients.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study in general medical wards patients who were expected to receive EN for ≥5 days. Exclusion criteria were hemodynamic instability, known significant gastrointestinal problems, and recent pancreatitis. Eligible patients were randomized to receive either Mucilin SF (15.2 g/L)-added Blendera (psyllium-added formula: Psyllium group [PG]) or Blendera (fiber-free formula: Control group [CG]). All patients were given EN for 10 days or until discharge/oral intake/death. Bowel movements (BMs) were monitored using King's Stool Chart.
Eighty-three patients were enrolled, 42 in the PG and 41 in the CG. Baseline characteristics were similar. The proportion of patients with ≥1 day of diarrhea (King's stool score ≥15) was comparable (42.9% vs 31.7%; P = 0.41, in PG and CG, respectively). There were no significant differences in the frequency of daily BMs and the median diarrhea score between PG and CG (3 vs 2, P = 0.06 and 3.8 vs 2.4, P = 0.42, respectively).
Supplementation with psyllium showed no beneficial effect on reducing incidence of diarrhea in general medical patients receiving EN. This study was registered on Thai Clinical Trials Registry (http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th: TCTR identification number TCTR20170821004).
肠内管饲患者腹泻并不少见,可导致不良结局。肠内营养(EN)配方中的纤维可能在喂养后腹泻中起作用。理论上,可溶性纤维对预防和治疗喂养后腹泻均有益,但不同类型的可溶性纤维可能效果不同。本研究旨在确定在标准 EN 中添加车前子能否降低管饲患者腹泻的发生率。
我们在预计接受 EN 治疗≥5 天的普通内科病房患者中进行了一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、对照研究。排除标准为血流动力学不稳定、已知有明显胃肠道问题和近期胰腺炎。合格患者被随机分为接受添加 Mucilin SF(15.2g/L)-车前子 Blendera(添加车前子配方:车前子组 [PG])或 Blendera(无纤维配方:对照组 [CG])。所有患者均接受 EN 治疗 10 天或直至出院/口服摄入/死亡。使用 King's 粪便图表监测粪便情况。
共纳入 83 例患者,PG 组 42 例,CG 组 41 例。基线特征相似。腹泻天数≥1 天(King's 粪便评分≥15)的患者比例相当(PG 组和 CG 组分别为 42.9%和 31.7%;P=0.41)。PG 组和 CG 组每日排便次数和中位数腹泻评分无显著差异(3 次 vs 2 次,P=0.06;3.8 分 vs 2.4 分,P=0.42)。
在接受 EN 治疗的普通内科患者中,添加车前子对降低腹泻发生率无有益作用。本研究在泰国临床试验注册中心注册(http://www.clinicaltrials.in.th:TCTR 识别号 TCTR20170821004)。