Merlino Giovanni, Sponza Massimo, Gigli Gian Luigi, Lorenzut Simone, Vit Alessandro, Gavrilovic Vladimir, Pellegrin Andrea, Cargnelutti Daniela, Valente Mariarosaria
Stroke Unit, Department of Neurosciences, Udine University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Udine University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy.
J Clin Med. 2018 Dec 5;7(12):518. doi: 10.3390/jcm7120518.
Endovascular therapy (EVT) represents the gold standard treatment in patients affected by acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Prior antiplatelet (APT) therapy might increase the risk of bleeding and modify the clinical outcome of AIS patients treated with EVT. Thus, we compared effectiveness and safety of EVT in Caucasian patients with and without previous use of APT agents. We recruited consecutive patients admitted to Udine University Hospital with AIS undergoing EVT from January 2015 to December 2017. The following outcomes were documented: successful recanalization, 3-month favorable outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), parenchymal hematoma (PH), and 3-month mortality. The study population included 100 patients (mean age 70.1 ± 11.2 years, 58% males). At time of admission, 34 patients were taking APT agents. Patients on APT pretreatment were older, had more vascular risk factors, and showed higher levels of serum creatinine than APT naïve patients. Moreover, prior APT therapy was associated with a higher rate of pre-stroke disability and a more severe stroke at admission. Patients pretreated with APT had higher rates of successful recanalization (91.2% vs. 74.2%, = 0.04). Prevalence of 3-month unfavorable outcome and 3-month mortality was significantly higher in APT-pretreated patients than in those without APT pretreatment. However, these associations were not confirmed on multivariable analyses. Prevalence of sICH and PH did not differ in the two groups. APT pretreatment is associated to successful recanalization rate, without increasing the risk of intracranial bleeding in patients with LVO undergoing EVT.
血管内治疗(EVT)是因大血管闭塞(LVO)导致的急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的金标准治疗方法。先前的抗血小板治疗(APT)可能会增加出血风险,并改变接受EVT治疗的AIS患者的临床结局。因此,我们比较了既往使用和未使用APT药物的白种人患者接受EVT的有效性和安全性。我们纳入了2015年1月至2017年12月在乌迪内大学医院因AIS接受EVT治疗的连续患者。记录了以下结局:成功再通、3个月时的良好结局、症状性颅内出血(sICH)、实质血肿(PH)和3个月死亡率。研究人群包括100例患者(平均年龄70.1±11.2岁,58%为男性)。入院时,34例患者正在服用APT药物。接受APT预处理的患者年龄更大,有更多的血管危险因素,血清肌酐水平高于未接受APT治疗的患者。此外,先前的APT治疗与卒中前残疾率较高和入院时卒中更严重有关。接受APT预处理的患者成功再通率更高(91.2%对74.2%,P = 0.04)。接受APT预处理的患者3个月不良结局和3个月死亡率的发生率显著高于未接受APT预处理的患者。然而,这些关联在多变量分析中未得到证实。两组中sICH和PH的发生率无差异。APT预处理与成功再通率相关,且不会增加接受EVT治疗的LVO患者颅内出血的风险。