Suppr超能文献

烟囱技术与单分支支架型人工血管治疗累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层患者的比较

Comparison of Chimney Technique and Single-Branched Stent Graft for Treating Patients with Type B Aortic Dissections that Involved the Left Subclavian Artery.

作者信息

Zhang Honggang, Huang He, Zhang Yepeng, Liu Zhao, Qiao Tong, Zhang Xiwei, Liu Changjian, Jiao Yuanyong, Zhou Min

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, The Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Zhongshan Road 321, Nanjing, 210008, People's Republic of China.

Department of Vascular Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Lianyungang, Lianyungang, 222002, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 May;42(5):648-656. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2145-3. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the short-term efficiency of two different endovascular repairs for type B aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery.

METHODS

From February 2013 to March 2016, a cohort of 43 patients with TBADs involving the LSA underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in two departments, consisting of 22 (Group A) with chimney grafts (CGs) and 21 (Group B) with single-branched stent graft (SBSG). Results of the two groups in perioperative and follow-up period (≥ 3 months) were comparatively analyzed, especially on aortic remodeling.

RESULTS

Endoluminal repair of the two groups was successfully carried out. The median follow-up period was 19 months (range, 3-43 months) in Group A and 12 months in Group B (range, 6-32 months). During the TEVAR, one CG compression occurred in Group A and one type I endoleak in Group B. During follow-up, four complications occurred in Group A (two CGs occlusion, one type I endoleak and one death from dissecting aneurysm rupture), compared with two occurred in Group B (one sidearm graft twist and one death from myocardial infarction). Complete thrombosis of the false lumen (FL) in thoracic aorta was revealed in 83.3% (15/18) cases in Group A and 89.5% (17/19) in Group B. Partial thrombosis of the FL was revealed in 16.7% (3/18) cases in Group A and 10.5% (2/19) in Group B. In the abdominal aorta, complete thrombosis of the FL was noted in 23.1% (3/13) cases in Group A and 36.4% (4/11) in Group B. Partial thrombosis of the FL was revealed in 76.9% (10/13) cases in Group A and 63.6% (7/11) in Group B. Significant true lumen re-expansion and false lumen regression were observed in different levels of the descending aorta by computed tomography angiography (CTA) in both Groups A and B (P < 0.05). No significant diametric changes of abdominal aorta were found during follow-up in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with TBADs involving the LSA, the chimney technique and the SBSG revealed comparable results. Further evaluation of more patients with longer follow-up is needed to substantiate these results.

摘要

目的

比较两种不同血管腔内修复术治疗累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层的短期疗效。

方法

2013年2月至2016年3月,43例累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层患者在两个科室接受了胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR),其中22例采用烟囱式移植物(CG组,A组),21例采用单分支支架型人工血管(SBSG组,B组)。对两组围手术期及随访期(≥3个月)的结果进行比较分析,尤其关注主动脉重塑情况。

结果

两组均成功完成腔内修复。A组中位随访时间为19个月(范围3 - 43个月),B组为12个月(范围6 - 32个月)。TEVAR术中,A组发生1例CG受压,B组发生1例Ⅰ型内漏。随访期间,A组发生4例并发症(2例CG闭塞、1例Ⅰ型内漏和1例因夹层动脉瘤破裂死亡),B组发生2例并发症(1例侧支移植物扭曲和1例因心肌梗死死亡)。A组胸主动脉假腔(FL)完全血栓形成率为83.3%(15/18),B组为89.5%(17/19);A组FL部分血栓形成率为16.7%(3/18),B组为10.5%(2/19)。腹主动脉中,A组FL完全血栓形成率为23.1%(3/13),B组为36.4%(4/11);A组FL部分血栓形成率为76.9%(10/13),B组为63.6%(7/11)。两组通过计算机断层扫描血管造影(CTA)均观察到降主动脉不同节段真腔显著扩张和假腔缩小(P < 0.05)。随访期间两组腹主动脉直径均无显著变化。

结论

对于累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层患者而言,烟囱技术和单分支支架型人工血管显示出相似的结果。需要进一步纳入更多患者并延长随访时间以证实这些结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验