• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

烟囱技术与单分支支架型人工血管治疗B型主动脉夹层患者的队列比较:一项回顾性队列研究

Comparison of chimney technique and single-branched stent graft in a cohort of patients with type B aortic dissections: a retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Xing Yue, Zhu Zhengrong, Zou Lan, Wu Jiayu, Xu Guojian, Xu Yiding, He Zhijian, Cao Jianqiang, Luo Canhua

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Jun 30;14(3):367-376. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-449. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

DOI:10.21037/cdt-23-449
PMID:38975006
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11223938/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Single-branched stent grafts and the chimney technique are widely used in the treatment of type B aortic dissection (TBAD). The main objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of single-branched stent grafts and the chimney technique in the treatment of TBAD.

METHODS

From January 2019 to December 2021, the retrospective cohort study contained a cohort of 91 patients with TBAD undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using single-branched stent grafts and the chimney technique. Group A included 55 patients treated with single-branched covered stents, and Group B included 36 patients treated with the chimney technique. We compared the effects of the procedures on peri-/post-operative outcomes between the two groups. The primary endpoint is clinical death, and the secondary endpoints include the patency of branch stents, the incidence of cerebral infarction, false lumen thrombosis, and the proportion of paraplegia.

RESULTS

For the baseline data, the two groups of patients show no differences in terms of age, gender, and associated symptoms. All procedures were successfully performed in both groups. The median follow-up period was 17.6 months (range, 10-34 months). During TEVAR, 5 (9.1%) type I endoleaks occurred in group A, and 11 (30.6%) occurred in group B (P<0.05). During follow-up, there were 2 cases (3.6%) of paraplegia and 1 case (1.8%) of cerebral infarction in Group A, while Group B had 1 case (2.8%) of paraplegia. Three patients in group B reported retrograde type A aortic dissection (RTAD), and 1 of them died (2.8%); however, there were no RTAD cases in group A. Complete thrombosis of the false lumen in the thoracic aorta was observed in 45.5% (25/55) of patients in group A and in 41.7% (15/36) in group B (P=0.72). No significant difference in the thrombosis-volume ratio in the whole false lumen was found during follow-up between group A (81.0%±2.9%) and group B (81.8%±2.6%; P=0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

Branched stent grafts can be used in cases with insufficient proximal landing zones and reduce the occurrence of type 1 endoleak compared to the chimney technique. This may help to prevent RTAD. Further research, including more cases and longer follow-up periods, is needed to substantiate these results.

摘要

背景

单分支支架型血管移植物和烟囱技术广泛应用于B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的治疗。本研究的主要目的是比较单分支支架型血管移植物和烟囱技术治疗TBAD的疗效。

方法

2019年1月至2021年12月,这项回顾性队列研究纳入了91例行胸主动脉腔内修复术(TEVAR)治疗TBAD的患者,采用单分支支架型血管移植物和烟囱技术。A组包括55例接受单分支覆膜支架治疗的患者,B组包括36例接受烟囱技术治疗的患者。我们比较了两组手术对围手术期/术后结局的影响。主要终点是临床死亡,次要终点包括分支支架通畅情况、脑梗死发生率、假腔血栓形成及截瘫比例。

结果

就基线数据而言,两组患者在年龄、性别及相关症状方面无差异。两组手术均成功完成。中位随访期为17.6个月(范围10 - 34个月)。TEVAR术中,A组发生5例(9.1%)I型内漏,B组发生11例(30.6%)(P<0.05)。随访期间,A组有2例(3.6%)发生截瘫,1例(1.8%)发生脑梗死;B组有1例(2.8%)发生截瘫。B组有3例患者报告发生逆行性A型主动脉夹层(RTAD),其中1例死亡(2.8%);而A组未发生RTAD病例。A组45.5%(25/55)的患者胸主动脉假腔完全血栓形成,B组为41.7%(15/36)(P = 0.72)。随访期间,A组(81.0%±2.9%)和B组(81.8%±2.6%;P = 0.23)整个假腔的血栓体积比无显著差异。

结论

与烟囱技术相比,分支支架型血管移植物可用于近端锚定区不足的病例,并减少I型内漏的发生。这可能有助于预防RTAD。需要进一步研究,包括纳入更多病例和更长随访期,以证实这些结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/adab4bda7752/cdt-14-03-367-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/65306926d764/cdt-14-03-367-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/e52320ee2915/cdt-14-03-367-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/adab4bda7752/cdt-14-03-367-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/65306926d764/cdt-14-03-367-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/e52320ee2915/cdt-14-03-367-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c323/11223938/adab4bda7752/cdt-14-03-367-f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of chimney technique and single-branched stent graft in a cohort of patients with type B aortic dissections: a retrospective cohort study.烟囱技术与单分支支架型人工血管治疗B型主动脉夹层患者的队列比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024 Jun 30;14(3):367-376. doi: 10.21037/cdt-23-449. Epub 2024 Jun 17.
2
Comparison of Chimney Technique and Single-Branched Stent Graft for Treating Patients with Type B Aortic Dissections that Involved the Left Subclavian Artery.烟囱技术与单分支支架型人工血管治疗累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层患者的比较
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019 May;42(5):648-656. doi: 10.1007/s00270-018-2145-3. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
3
Implantation of Unibody Single-Branched Stent Graft for Patients with Type B Aortic Dissections Involving the Left Subclavian Artery: 1-Year Follow-Up Outcomes.单一体单分支支架型人工血管植入治疗累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层患者:1年随访结果
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017 Nov;40(11):1678-1686. doi: 10.1007/s00270-017-1748-4. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
4
Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair With Single/Double Chimney Technique for Aortic Arch Pathologies.采用单/双烟囱技术的胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗主动脉弓病变
J Endovasc Ther. 2017 Jun;24(3):383-393. doi: 10.1177/1526602817698702. Epub 2017 Mar 21.
5
Single-branched stent-graft with on-table fenestration for endovascular repair of primary retrograde type A aortic dissection: A multicenter retrospective study.用于原发性逆行A型主动脉夹层腔内修复的台上开窗单分支支架型人工血管:一项多中心回顾性研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 17;9:1034654. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1034654. eCollection 2022.
6
Mid-term Comparison of One-Piece Branched Stent-Graft and Chimney Technique Treating Aortic Arch Pathologies.一体式分支型覆膜支架与烟囱技术治疗主动脉弓部病变的中期比较。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2022 Jun;45(6):733-743. doi: 10.1007/s00270-022-03063-9. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
7
Clinical outcomes and aortic remodeling after Castor single-branched stent-graft implantation for type B aortic dissections involving left subclavian artery.Castor单分支支架型人工血管植入治疗累及左锁骨下动脉的B型主动脉夹层后的临床疗效及主动脉重塑
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 May 30;11:1370908. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1370908. eCollection 2024.
8
Retrograde type A dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for type B aortic dissection.胸主动脉腔内修复术后逆行性 A 型夹层(用于治疗 B 型主动脉夹层)
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.04.047. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
9
Outcomes of Castor Single-Branched Stent Graft for Reconstruction of Multiple Supra-Aortic Branches in Aortic Arch Disease.蓖麻单分支支架型人工血管重建主动脉弓疾病中多支主动脉弓上分支的疗效
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Oct 26:15266028231205411. doi: 10.1177/15266028231205411.
10
Clinical comparative analysis of 3D printing-assisted extracorporeal pre-fenestration and Castor integrated branch stent techniques in treating type B aortic dissections with inadequate proximal landing zones.3D 打印辅助体外预开窗与 Castor 一体化分支支架技术治疗近端锚定区不足的 B 型主动脉夹层的临床对比分析。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Feb 26;24(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-03799-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of single-branched stent graft in the treatment of type B aortic dissection: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.单分支支架型人工血管治疗B型主动脉夹层的疗效与安全性:队列研究的Meta分析
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 11;20(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s13019-024-03339-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-Term Outcomes in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection or Intramural Hematoma Depending on Proximal Landing Zone.根据近端锚定区,胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗复杂B型主动脉夹层或壁内血肿的长期预后
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 18;12(16):5380. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165380.
2
Effectiveness of Proximal Landing Zone 1 and 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Aortic Dissection by Comparing Outcomes With Thoracic Arch Aneurysm.通过比较胸主动脉瘤的治疗结果,评估近端着陆区1和2的胸主动脉腔内修复术治疗B型主动脉夹层的有效性。
J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Feb;32(1):170-184. doi: 10.1177/15266028231174407. Epub 2023 May 24.
3
ORal anticoagulation risks late aortic intervention in Conservatively managed type B Aortic dissection (ORCA study).
保守治疗的 B 型主动脉夹层中口服抗凝剂增加晚期主动脉介入治疗的风险(ORCA 研究)。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022 Oct 4;62(5). doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezac495.
4
Type 1A Endoleak after TEVAR in the Aortic Arch: A Review of the Literature.主动脉弓腔内修复术后ⅠA型内漏:文献综述
J Pers Med. 2022 Aug 4;12(8):1279. doi: 10.3390/jpm12081279.
5
Chimney Technique and Single-Branched Stent Graft for the Left Subclavian Artery Preservation During Zone 2 Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Type B Acute Aortic Syndromes.烟囱技术和单分支支架移植物在 B 型急性主动脉综合征区 2 型胸主动脉腔内修复术中用于左锁骨下动脉保护。
J Endovasc Ther. 2023 Dec;30(6):849-858. doi: 10.1177/15266028221102657. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
6
Long-term patency of surgical left subclavian artery revascularization.外科手术重建左侧锁骨下动脉的长期通畅率。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jun;75(6):1977-1984.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.12.078. Epub 2022 Jan 26.
7
Early and Mid-Term Outcomes of Open versus Endovascular Left Subclavian Artery Debranching for Thoracic Aortic Diseases.胸主动脉疾病开放与腔内左锁骨下动脉去分支术的早期和中期结果。
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Jun 20;28(3):193-203. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.21-00206. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
8
Long-term results of total endovascular repair of arch-involving aortic pathologies using parallel grafts for supra-aortic debranching.使用平行移植物进行主动脉弓去分支术治疗累及主动脉弓的主动脉病变的全腔内修复的长期结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Mar;75(3):813-823.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.09.020. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
9
Outflow Through Aortic Side Branches Drives False Lumen Patency in Type B Aortic Dissection.经主动脉侧支流出驱动B型主动脉夹层假腔通畅。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Aug 13;8:710603. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.710603. eCollection 2021.
10
Primary and Secondary Outcome Reporting in Randomized Trials: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.随机试验的主要和次要结局报告:JACC 最新综述。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Aug 24;78(8):827-839. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.06.024.