Suppr超能文献

非中性粒细胞减少症患者侵袭性曲霉菌病的即时诊断:支气管肺泡灌洗液中半乳甘露聚糖侧向流动检测法与曲霉特异性侧向流动检测装置试验的比较。

Point-of-care diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis in non-neutropenic patients: Aspergillus Galactomannan Lateral Flow Assay versus Aspergillus-specific Lateral Flow Device test in bronchoalveolar lavage.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.

Department of Pathology, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2019 Mar;62(3):230-236. doi: 10.1111/myc.12881. Epub 2019 Jan 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

We compared new Aspergillus Galactomannan Lateral Flow Assay with the newly formatted Aspergillus-specific Lateral Flow device tests for the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) in non-neutropenic patients.

METHODS

We performed both tests in 82 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples from 82 patients at risk for IPA but without underlying haematologic malignancy. Samples were collected between September 2016 and September 2018 at the University of California San Diego, United States. IPA was classified following two published consensus criteria.

RESULTS

Classification of cases varied widely between the two consensus criteria. When using criteria established for the intensive care unit, 26/82 patients (32%) met criteria for proven or putative IPA. Both point-of-care assays showed sensitivities ranging between 58% and 69%, with specificities between 68% and 75%. Sensitivity increased up to 81% when both tests were combined.

CONCLUSION

The study outlines the need for updated, unified and more broadly applicable consensus definitions for classifying IPA in non-neutropenic patients, a work that is currently in progress. Both point-of-care tests showed comparable performance, with sensitivities and specificities in the 60%-70% range when used alone and increasing to 80% when used in combination. The new point-of-care tests may serve a role at the bedside in those with clinical suspicion of IPA.

摘要

背景

我们比较了新型曲霉半乳甘露聚糖侧向流动检测法与新型曲霉特异性侧向流动检测设备,用于诊断非中性粒细胞减少患者的侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)。

方法

我们在美国加利福尼亚大学圣地亚哥分校进行了这两项检测,共检测了 82 例有 IPA 风险但无基础血液恶性肿瘤的支气管肺泡灌洗液样本。样本采集时间为 2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 9 月。根据两项已发表的共识标准对 IPA 进行分类。

结果

两种共识标准的病例分类差异很大。当使用为重症监护病房制定的标准时,82 例患者中有 26 例(32%)符合确诊或疑似 IPA 的标准。两种即时检测均显示出 58%至 69%的敏感性,特异性在 68%至 75%之间。当两种检测联合使用时,敏感性增加至 81%。

结论

该研究概述了目前正在进行的为非中性粒细胞减少患者 IPA 分类制定更新、统一和更广泛适用的共识定义的必要性。两种即时检测的性能相当,单独使用时敏感性和特异性在 60%-70%范围内,联合使用时可提高至 80%。新型即时检测可能在 IPA 临床疑似患者的床边发挥作用。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
Invasive Pulmonary Aspergillosis.侵袭性肺曲霉病
J Fungi (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;9(2):131. doi: 10.3390/jof9020131.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验