Cancer Center Amsterdam, Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Int J Cancer. 2019 May 1;144(9):2339-2346. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32004. Epub 2019 Jan 10.
We studied whether triage of human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive women participating in an HPV-based screening programme can be improved by including the HPV result at the previous screen in the triage algorithm. We analyzed data of a subgroup of 366 women from the POBASCAM trial, screened by cytology and HPV cotesting. Women were included if they tested HPV-positive in the second HPV-based screening round. We evaluated the clinical performance of 16 strategies, consisting of cytology, HPV genotyping, and/or previous screen HPV result. The clinical endpoint was cervical precancer or cancer (CIN3+). The current Dutch triage testing policy for HPV-positive women is to refer women for colposcopy if they have abnormal cytology at baseline or after 6-18 months. In the second HPV-based screening round, this strategy yielded a negative predictive value (NPV) of 95.8% (95% confidence interval: 91.9-98.2) and colposcopy referral rate of 37.6% (32.3-43.2%). Replacing repeat cytology by the previous screen HPV result yielded a similar NPV (96.9%, 93.3-98.9) and colposcopy referral rate (38.8%, 33.4-44.4). A higher NPV (99.2%, 96.3-100%) at the cost of a higher colposcopy referral rate (49.2%, 43.6-54.8) was achieved when cytology was combined with HPV16/18 genotyping. The other 13 triage strategies yielded a lower NPV, a higher colposcopy referral rate or performed similarly but required additional testing. HPV-positive women in the second HPV-based screening round can be suitably managed by cytology, HPV16/18 genotyping and the HPV result at the previous screen, obviating the need for repeat testing of HPV-positive, cytology negative women.
我们研究了在 HPV 阳性妇女的 HPV 基于筛查计划的分类中,是否可以通过包括前一次筛查的 HPV 结果来改善分类算法。我们分析了 POBASCAM 试验的 366 名妇女的亚组数据,这些妇女通过细胞学和 HPV 联合检测进行筛查。如果妇女在第二轮 HPV 基础筛查中 HPV 阳性,则纳入研究。我们评估了 16 种策略的临床性能,这些策略包括细胞学、HPV 基因分型和/或前一次筛查的 HPV 结果。临床终点是宫颈前癌或癌(CIN3+)。目前荷兰 HPV 阳性妇女的筛查检测政策是,如果妇女在基线时或 6-18 个月后细胞学异常,则转介行阴道镜检查。在第二轮 HPV 基础筛查中,该策略的阴性预测值(NPV)为 95.8%(95%置信区间:91.9-98.2),阴道镜检查转诊率为 37.6%(32.3-43.2%)。用前一次筛查的 HPV 结果代替重复细胞学检查,得到了相似的 NPV(96.9%,93.3-98.9)和阴道镜检查转诊率(38.8%,33.4-44.4%)。当细胞学联合 HPV16/18 基因分型时,可获得更高的 NPV(99.2%,96.3-100%),但阴道镜检查转诊率更高(49.2%,43.6-54.8%)。其他 13 种分类策略的 NPV 较低,阴道镜检查转诊率较高,或表现相似但需要额外的检测。在第二轮 HPV 基础筛查中 HPV 阳性的妇女,可以通过细胞学、HPV16/18 基因分型和前一次筛查的 HPV 结果进行适当管理,避免对 HPV 阳性、细胞学阴性的妇女进行重复检测。