Kennedy May G, McClish Donna, Jones Resa M, Jin Yan, Wilson Diane B, Bishop Diane L
Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine.
J Community Psychol. 2018 Sep;46(7):925-940. doi: 10.1002/jcop.21983. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
Universal screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) is recommended for individuals 50-75 years of age, but screening uptake is suboptimal and African Americans have suffered persistent racial disparities in CRC incidence and deaths. We compared a culturally tailored fictional narrative and an engaging expert interview on the ability to increase intentions to be screened for CRC among African American women. In a post-only experiment, women (N = 442) in face-to-face listening groups in African American churches heard audio recordings of either a narrative or an expert interview. Questionnaires were completed immediately afterward and 30 days later. Women who heard narratives reported stronger intentions to be screened with a home stool blood test than women who heard the interview; the effect lasted at least 30 days. Culturally tailored, fictional narratives appear to be an effective persuasive strategy for reducing racial disparities in CRC outcomes.
建议对50至75岁的人群进行结直肠癌(CRC)的普遍筛查,但筛查的接受度并不理想,非裔美国人在CRC发病率和死亡率方面一直存在种族差异。我们比较了一个针对特定文化定制的虚构故事和一场引人入胜的专家访谈在提高非裔美国女性进行CRC筛查意愿方面的能力。在一项仅设后测的实验中,非裔美国人教堂中面对面聆听小组的女性(N = 442)收听了故事或专家访谈的录音。之后立即以及30天后完成问卷调查。与收听访谈的女性相比,收听故事的女性报告称更有意愿进行家用粪便潜血检测;这种效果至少持续了30天。针对特定文化定制的虚构故事似乎是减少CRC结果中种族差异的一种有效说服策略。